From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: Allocate full pages for {DE,EN}CRYPT ops on SNP-enabled hosts
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:25:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723002547.7BF971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723000715.1235773-1-seanjc@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE) does not guarantee an isolated, page-aligned physical page under KASAN/SLUB debug, leading to Host RMP #PF crashes.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The PSP driver miscalculates the number of pages to transition to firmware-owned state for guest-owned buffers, causing firmware RMP violations.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: Allocate full pages for {DE,EN}CRYPT ops on SNP-enabled hosts ---
commit d5055bec1548a3803ac93e35043a743044a123b7
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: SEV: Allocate full pages for {DE,EN}CRYPT ops on SNP-enabled hosts
When {de,en}crypting memory of an SEV or SEV-ES guest on an SNP-enabled host
via a temporary buffer, this commit allocates a full 4KiB page for the buffer.
This ensures the page containing the buffer is wholly owned by KVM. It intends
to prevent concurrent kernel accesses from triggering spurious RMP #PF
violations when firmware temporarily takes ownership of the page.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 74fb15551e83f..e3733ed9d5886 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -1280,6 +1280,17 @@ static void *sev_dbg_crypt_slow_alloc(struct page *page, unsigned long __va,
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE((*pa & PAGE_MASK) != ((*pa + *nr_bytes - 1) & PAGE_MASK)))
> return NULL;
>
> + /*
> + * If SNP is enabled, i.e. the RMP is active, allocate a full page to
> + * prevent concurrent accesses to the page. As required by firmware,
> + * the PSP driver updates the RMP to temporarily transfer ownership of
> + * the page to Firmware while the {DE,EN}CRYPT operation is in-progress,
> + * and so concurrent software accesses to the page will encounter
> + * seemingly spurious RMP #PF violations
> + */
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> + return kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
[Severity: High]
Does kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL) guarantee an isolated, page-aligned
physical page when SLUB debugging (e.g., SLAB_RED_ZONE) or KASAN is enabled?
When debugging is enabled, kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE) requires extra metadata, pushing
the allocation into a higher-order slab cache (like kmalloc-8k). The resulting
buffer is not guaranteed to be page-aligned and shares its underlying physical
pages with adjacent slab objects, KASAN redzones, and SLUB metadata.
When sev_issue_dbg_cmd() passes this buffer as dst_addr, the PSP driver in
snp_map_cmd_buf_desc() transitions the page to firmware-owned. Concurrent
host kernel accesses to the shared page (e.g., KASAN background checks or
another CPU accessing adjacent objects) will trigger a fatal Host RMP #PF and
crash the host kernel.
Should this use a page allocation API like __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL) or
alloc_page() instead to guarantee an exclusive physical page?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the PSP driver miscalculates the number of
pages to transition to firmware-owned state for guest-owned buffers in
snp_map_cmd_buf_desc():
drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c:snp_map_cmd_buf_desc() {
...
npages = PAGE_ALIGN(desc->len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (rmp_mark_pages_firmware(*desc->paddr_ptr, npages, true)) {
...
}
Because this calculation ignores the physical address offset
(desc->paddr_ptr & ~PAGE_MASK), an unaligned buffer that crosses a page
boundary but has a total length <= PAGE_SIZE evaluates to 1 page instead of 2.
If the unaligned buffer from the KASAN-enabled kmalloc() above crosses a page
boundary, rmp_mark_pages_firmware() will only transition the first physical
page.
When the SEV firmware accesses the tail of the buffer on the untransitioned
second page, will this trigger a firmware RMP violation and cause the command
to fail?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723000715.1235773-1-seanjc@google.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 0:07 [PATCH] KVM: SEV: Allocate full pages for {DE,EN}CRYPT ops on SNP-enabled hosts Sean Christopherson
2026-07-23 0:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723002547.7BF971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox