From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program mutex
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:47:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723174751.1180334-8-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723174751.1180334-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
The channel_program struct is manipulated without a serialization
mechanism to ensure consistent behavior. Take a broad stroke of
putting the entire structure behind a mutex, and ensure everything
that needs private->cp holds this mutex.
There are a couple where the cio layer's subchannel->lock performs
this role in this code, which isn't correct (it should only be used
when touching the actual subchannel, like cio_enable_subchannel()),
so adjust the locations where that spinlock is acquired/released
to correctly coexist with this new mutex.
Fixes: 0a19e61e6d4c ("vfio: ccw: introduce channel program interfaces")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 10 +++++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 10 +++++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 1a095085bc72..1d8c2ed9da50 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
is_final = !(scsw_actl(&irb->scsw) &
(SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
+
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) {
cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);
if (is_final && private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING) {
@@ -98,6 +100,8 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
cp_is_finished = true;
}
}
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
memcpy(private->io_region->irb_area, irb, sizeof(*irb));
mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
@@ -259,12 +263,16 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_event(struct subchannel *sch, int process)
rc = 0;
if (cio_update_schib(sch)) {
- if (private)
+ if (private) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_NOT_OPER);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
+out:
return rc;
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
index 4d7988ea47ef..9fbe97bd23f9 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
@@ -25,17 +25,15 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sch->lock, flags);
-
orb = cp_get_orb(&private->cp, sch);
- if (!orb) {
- ret = -EIO;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!orb)
+ return -EIO;
VFIO_CCW_TRACE_EVENT(5, "stIO");
VFIO_CCW_TRACE_EVENT(5, dev_name(&sch->dev));
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sch->lock, flags);
+
/* Issue "Start Subchannel" */
ccode = ssch(sch->schid, orb);
@@ -71,7 +69,6 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
default:
ret = ccode;
}
-out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -171,7 +168,9 @@ static void fsm_notoper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER;
/* This is usually handled during CLOSE event */
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
cp_free(&private->cp);
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
}
/*
@@ -252,6 +251,8 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PROCESSING;
memcpy(scsw, io_region->scsw_area, sizeof(*scsw));
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
if (scsw->cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_START_FUNC) {
orb = (union orb *)io_region->orb_area;
@@ -300,6 +301,8 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
cp_free(&private->cp);
goto err_out;
}
+
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
return;
} else if (scsw->cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_HALT_FUNC) {
VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2,
@@ -320,6 +323,7 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
}
err_out:
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE;
trace_vfio_ccw_fsm_io_request(scsw->cmd.fctl, schid,
io_region->ret_code, errstr);
@@ -410,7 +414,11 @@ static void fsm_close(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY;
spin_unlock_irq(&sch->lock);
+
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
cp_free(&private->cp);
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
return;
err_unlock:
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 032a1cdf4df7..04800cfa779b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -38,8 +38,13 @@ static void vfio_ccw_dma_unmap(struct vfio_device *vdev, u64 iova, u64 length)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
/* Drivers MUST unpin pages in response to an invalidation. */
- if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length))
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
+ if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
return;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
vfio_ccw_mdev_reset(private);
}
@@ -50,6 +55,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
mutex_init(&private->io_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&private->cp_mutex);
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&private->crw);
INIT_WORK(&private->io_work, vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo);
@@ -90,6 +96,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
out_free_cp:
kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
out_free_private:
+ mutex_destroy(&private->cp_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -141,6 +148,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
+ mutex_destroy(&private->cp_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index 0501d4bbcdbd..ac5aaa78a74b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct vfio_ccw_parent {
* @schib_region: MMIO region for SCHIB information
* @crw_region: MMIO region for getting channel report words
* @num_regions: number of additional regions
+ * @cp_mutex: protect against concurrent update of CP resources
* @cp: channel program for the current I/O operation
* @irb: irb info received from interrupt
* @scsw: scsw info
@@ -115,7 +116,9 @@ struct vfio_ccw_private {
struct ccw_crw_region *crw_region;
int num_regions;
+ struct mutex cp_mutex;
struct channel_program cp;
+
struct irb irb;
union scsw scsw;
struct list_head crw;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 17:47 [PATCH v3 0/8] s390/vfio_ccw fixes Eric Farman
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] s390/vfio_ccw: free all memory if cp_init() fails Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/vfio_ccw: limit the number of channel program segments Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] s390/vfio_ccw: fix out of bounds check on CCW array Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 20:38 ` Eric Farman
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] s390/vfio_ccw: calculate idal length based on idaw type Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure index for read/write regions are within range Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-07-23 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program mutex sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a crw lock Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723174751.1180334-8-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox