Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, alex@shazbot.org,
	kwankhede@nvidia.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add method to set a new guest AP configuration
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:13:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724161351.1802644-10-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724161351.1802644-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

Adds a new vfio_ap_set_new_config function to set a guest's AP
configuration. This is needed in order to set the state of the mdev when
it is migrated from a remote host system during the RESUMING phase.

Key changes:
* Refactored code from the ap_config_store function - handles changes to
  the sysfs ap_config attribute - into a new, non-static function which
  is callable from the ap_config_store function as well as the live guest
  migration code.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 227 ++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  61 +++++++
 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 678bdd4c82e9..454bb9fe1971 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -81,53 +81,6 @@ static inline void release_update_locks_for_kvm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
 }
 
-/**
- * get_update_locks_for_mdev: Acquire the locks required to dynamically update a
- *			      KVM guest's APCB in the proper order.
- *
- * @matrix_mdev: a pointer to a struct ap_matrix_mdev object containing the AP
- *		 configuration data to use to update a KVM guest's APCB.
- *
- * The proper locking order is:
- * 1. matrix_dev->guests_lock: required to use the KVM pointer to update a KVM
- *			       guest's APCB.
- * 2. matrix_mdev->kvm->lock:  required to update a guest's APCB
- * 3. matrix_dev->mdevs_lock:  required to access data stored in a matrix_mdev
- *
- * Note: If @matrix_mdev is NULL or is not attached to a KVM guest, the KVM
- *	 lock will not be taken.
- */
-static inline void get_update_locks_for_mdev(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
-	if (matrix_mdev && matrix_mdev->kvm)
-		mutex_lock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
-	mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
-}
-
-/**
- * release_update_locks_for_mdev: Release the locks used to dynamically update a
- *				  KVM guest's APCB in the proper order.
- *
- * @matrix_mdev: a pointer to a struct ap_matrix_mdev object containing the AP
- *		 configuration data to use to update a KVM guest's APCB.
- *
- * The proper unlocking order is:
- * 1. matrix_dev->mdevs_lock
- * 2. matrix_mdev->kvm->lock
- * 3. matrix_dev->guests_lock
- *
- * Note: If @matrix_mdev is NULL or is not attached to a KVM guest, the KVM
- *	 lock will not be released.
- */
-static inline void release_update_locks_for_mdev(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
-{
-	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
-	if (matrix_mdev && matrix_mdev->kvm)
-		mutex_unlock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
-	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
-}
-
 /**
  * get_update_locks_by_apqn: Find the mdev to which an APQN is assigned and
  *			     acquire the locks required to update the APCB of
@@ -642,8 +595,7 @@ static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void vfio_ap_matrix_init(struct ap_config_info *info,
-				struct ap_matrix *matrix)
+void vfio_ap_matrix_init(struct ap_config_info *info, struct ap_matrix *matrix)
 {
 	matrix->apm_max = info->apxa ? info->na : 63;
 	matrix->aqm_max = info->apxa ? info->nd : 15;
@@ -875,7 +827,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unlink_fr_queues(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
 			q = vfio_ap_mdev_get_queue(matrix_mdev,
 						   AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
 			if (q)
-				q->matrix_mdev = NULL;
+				vfio_ap_mdev_link_queue(matrix_mdev, q);
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -1014,19 +966,20 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_link_adapter(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
 	unsigned long apqi;
 
 	for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm, AP_DOMAINS)
-		vfio_ap_mdev_link_apqn(matrix_mdev,
-				       AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
+		vfio_ap_mdev_link_apqn(matrix_mdev, AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
 }
 
-static void collect_queues_to_reset(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
-				    unsigned long apid,
-				    struct list_head *qlist)
+static void collect_queues_by_apid(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
+				   unsigned long apid,
+				   struct list_head *qlist)
 {
 	struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
 	unsigned long  apqi;
 
 	for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb.aqm, AP_DOMAINS) {
-		q = vfio_ap_mdev_get_queue(matrix_mdev, AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
+		q = matrix_mdev ?
+				vfio_ap_mdev_get_queue(matrix_mdev, AP_MKQID(apid, apqi)) :
+				vfio_ap_find_queue(AP_MKQID(apid, apqi));
 		if (q)
 			list_add_tail(&q->reset_qnode, qlist);
 	}
@@ -1038,7 +991,7 @@ static void reset_queues_for_apid(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
 	struct list_head qlist;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qlist);
-	collect_queues_to_reset(matrix_mdev, apid, &qlist);
+	collect_queues_by_apid(matrix_mdev, apid, &qlist);
 	vfio_ap_mdev_reset_qlist(&qlist);
 }
 
@@ -1054,7 +1007,7 @@ static int reset_queues_for_apids(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qlist);
 
 	for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, apm_reset, AP_DEVICES)
-		collect_queues_to_reset(matrix_mdev, apid, &qlist);
+		collect_queues_by_apid(matrix_mdev, apid, &qlist);
 
 	return vfio_ap_mdev_reset_qlist(&qlist);
 }
@@ -1725,54 +1678,100 @@ static void ap_matrix_copy(struct ap_matrix *dst, struct ap_matrix *src)
 	bitmap_copy(dst->adm, src->adm, AP_DOMAINS);
 }
 
-static ssize_t ap_config_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
-			       const char *buf, size_t count)
+static void get_removed_matrixes(struct ap_matrix *m_removed,
+				 struct ap_matrix *m_old,
+				 struct ap_matrix *m_new)
 {
-	struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct ap_matrix m_new, m_old, m_added, m_removed;
+	bitmap_andnot(m_removed->apm, m_old->apm, m_new->apm, AP_DEVICES);
+	bitmap_andnot(m_removed->aqm, m_old->aqm, m_new->aqm, AP_DOMAINS);
+	bitmap_andnot(m_removed->adm, m_old->adm, m_new->adm, AP_DOMAINS);
+}
+
+static void get_added_matrixes(struct ap_matrix *m_added,
+			       struct ap_matrix *m_old,
+			       struct ap_matrix *m_new)
+{
+	bitmap_andnot(m_added->apm, m_new->apm, m_old->apm, AP_DEVICES);
+	bitmap_andnot(m_added->aqm, m_new->aqm, m_old->aqm, AP_DOMAINS);
+	bitmap_andnot(m_added->adm, m_new->adm, m_old->adm, AP_DOMAINS);
+}
+
+static int validate_new_state(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	/* Ensure new state is valid, else undo new state */
+	rc = vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(matrix_mdev);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	rc = ap_matrix_overflow_check(matrix_mdev);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void link_new_queues(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
+			    struct ap_matrix *m_added)
+{
+	unsigned long apid, apqi;
+
+	for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, m_added->apm, AP_DEVICES)
+		vfio_ap_mdev_link_adapter(matrix_mdev, apid);
+
+	for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, m_added->aqm, AP_DOMAINS)
+		vfio_ap_mdev_link_domain(matrix_mdev, apqi);
+}
+
+/**
+ * vfio_ap_set_new_guest_config:
+ *
+ * Set a new AP configuration for a guest.
+ *
+ * @matrix_mdev: Object used to maintain the AP configuration for a guest
+ * @m_new:		 Object used to set the new AP configuration
+ *
+ * Returns: zero (0) if the new AP configuration is successfully set; otherwise,
+ *	    returns an error:
+ *
+ *	    ~ EADDRNOTAVAIL One or more APQNs are reserved for host use
+ *	    ~ EADDRINUSE    One or more APQNs are assigned to another mdev
+ *	    ~ ENODEV	    An adapter, domain or control domain in the new
+ *			    AP configuration exceeds the max architected value
+ */
+int vfio_ap_set_new_guest_config(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
+				 struct ap_matrix *m_new)
+{
+	struct ap_matrix m_old, m_old_shadow, m_added, m_removed;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(apm_filtered, AP_DEVICES);
-	unsigned long newbit;
-	char *newbuf, *rest;
-	int rc = count;
 	bool do_update;
+	int rc;
 
-	newbuf = kstrndup(buf, AP_CONFIG_STRLEN, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!newbuf)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	rest = newbuf;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ap_attr_mutex);
+	assert_has_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
 
-	mutex_lock(&ap_attr_mutex);
-	get_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
-
-	/* Save old state */
+	/* Save the old state */
 	ap_matrix_copy(&m_old, &matrix_mdev->matrix);
-	if (parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.apm, AP_DEVICES) ||
-	    parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.aqm, AP_DOMAINS) ||
-	    parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.adm, AP_DOMAINS)) {
-		rc = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	ap_matrix_copy(&m_old_shadow, &matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb);
 
-	bitmap_andnot(m_removed.apm, m_old.apm, m_new.apm, AP_DEVICES);
-	bitmap_andnot(m_removed.aqm, m_old.aqm, m_new.aqm, AP_DOMAINS);
-	bitmap_andnot(m_added.apm, m_new.apm, m_old.apm, AP_DEVICES);
-	bitmap_andnot(m_added.aqm, m_new.aqm, m_old.aqm, AP_DOMAINS);
+	/*
+	 * Get the adapters, domains and control domains added and/or removed
+	 * from the existing configuration
+	 */
+	get_removed_matrixes(&m_removed, &m_old, m_new);
+	get_added_matrixes(&m_added, &m_old, m_new);
 
 	/* Need new bitmaps in matrix_mdev for validation */
-	ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, &m_new);
+	ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, m_new);
 
 	/* Ensure new state is valid, else undo new state */
-	rc = vfio_ap_mdev_validate_masks(matrix_mdev);
-	if (rc) {
-		ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, &m_old);
-		goto out;
-	}
-	rc = ap_matrix_overflow_check(matrix_mdev);
+	rc = validate_new_state(matrix_mdev);
 	if (rc) {
 		ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, &m_old);
-		goto out;
+		ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->shadow_apcb, &m_old_shadow);
+		return rc;
 	}
-	rc = count;
 
 	/* Need old bitmaps in matrix_mdev for unplug/unlink */
 	ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, &m_old);
@@ -1782,14 +1781,10 @@ static ssize_t ap_config_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr
 	vfio_ap_mdev_hot_unplug_domains(matrix_mdev, m_removed.aqm);
 
 	/* Need new bitmaps in matrix_mdev for linking new adapters/domains */
-	ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, &m_new);
-
-	/* Link newly added adapters */
-	for_each_set_bit_inv(newbit, m_added.apm, AP_DEVICES)
-		vfio_ap_mdev_link_adapter(matrix_mdev, newbit);
+	ap_matrix_copy(&matrix_mdev->matrix, m_new);
 
-	for_each_set_bit_inv(newbit, m_added.aqm, AP_DOMAINS)
-		vfio_ap_mdev_link_domain(matrix_mdev, newbit);
+	/* Link queues associated with the newly added adapters and domains */
+	link_new_queues(matrix_mdev, &m_added);
 
 	/* filter resources not bound to vfio-ap */
 	do_update = vfio_ap_mdev_filter_matrix(matrix_mdev, apm_filtered);
@@ -1800,7 +1795,39 @@ static ssize_t ap_config_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr
 		vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb(matrix_mdev);
 		reset_queues_for_apids(matrix_mdev, apm_filtered);
 	}
-out:
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t ap_config_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+			       const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct ap_matrix m_new;
+	char *newbuf, *rest;
+	ssize_t rc;
+
+	newbuf = kstrndup(buf, AP_CONFIG_STRLEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!newbuf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	rest = newbuf;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ap_attr_mutex);
+	get_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
+
+	if (parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.apm, AP_DEVICES) ||
+	    parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.aqm, AP_DOMAINS) ||
+	    parse_bitmap(&rest, m_new.adm, AP_DOMAINS)) {
+		kfree(newbuf);
+		release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
+		mutex_unlock(&ap_attr_mutex);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	rc = vfio_ap_set_new_guest_config(matrix_mdev, &m_new);
+	if (!rc)
+		rc = count;
+
 	release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
 	mutex_unlock(&ap_attr_mutex);
 	kfree(newbuf);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
index 1fbdfcce5a11..150dfce8a674 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
@@ -157,6 +157,62 @@ struct vfio_ap_queue {
 	struct work_struct reset_work;
 };
 
+/**
+ * get_update_locks_for_mdev: Acquire the locks required to dynamically update a
+ *			      KVM guest's APCB in the proper order.
+ *
+ * @matrix_mdev: a pointer to a struct ap_matrix_mdev object containing the AP
+ *		 configuration data to use to update a KVM guest's APCB.
+ *
+ * The proper locking order is:
+ * 1. matrix_dev->guests_lock: required to use the KVM pointer to update a KVM
+ *			       guest's APCB.
+ * 2. matrix_mdev->kvm->lock:  required to update a guest's APCB
+ * 3. matrix_dev->mdevs_lock:  required to access data stored in a matrix_mdev
+ *
+ * Note: If @matrix_mdev is NULL or is not attached to a KVM guest, the KVM
+ *	 lock will not be taken.
+ */
+static inline void get_update_locks_for_mdev(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
+	if (matrix_mdev && matrix_mdev->kvm)
+		mutex_lock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
+	mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * release_update_locks_for_mdev: Release the locks used to dynamically update a
+ *				  KVM guest's APCB in the proper order.
+ *
+ * @matrix_mdev: a pointer to a struct ap_matrix_mdev object containing the AP
+ *		 configuration data to use to update a KVM guest's APCB.
+ *
+ * The proper unlocking order is:
+ * 1. matrix_dev->mdevs_lock
+ * 2. matrix_mdev->kvm->lock
+ * 3. matrix_dev->guests_lock
+ *
+ * Note: If @matrix_mdev is NULL or is not attached to a KVM guest, the KVM
+ *	 lock will not be released.
+ */
+static inline void release_update_locks_for_mdev(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
+	if (matrix_mdev && matrix_mdev->kvm)
+		mutex_unlock(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void
+assert_has_update_locks_for_mdev(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
+	if (matrix_mdev && matrix_mdev->kvm)
+		lockdep_assert_held(&matrix_mdev->kvm->lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
+}
+
 int vfio_ap_mdev_get_num_queues(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix);
 
 int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
@@ -172,9 +228,14 @@ void vfio_ap_on_cfg_changed(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
 void vfio_ap_on_scan_complete(struct ap_config_info *new_config_info,
 			      struct ap_config_info *old_config_info);
 
+void vfio_ap_matrix_init(struct ap_config_info *info, struct ap_matrix *matrix);
+
 void vfio_ap_init_migration_capabilities(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev);
 int vfio_ap_init_migration_data(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev);
 void vfio_ap_release_migration_data(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev);
 void vfio_ap_reset_migration_state(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev);
 
+int vfio_ap_set_new_guest_config(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
+				 struct ap_matrix *m_new);
+
 #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 16:13 [PATCH v5 00/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration support Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Provide function to get the number of queues assigned to mdev Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] s390/vfio-ap: Functions to initialize/release vfio device migration data Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: Reset migration state in VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl handler Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] s390-vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to save the vfio device migration state Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RESUMING Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` Anthony Krowiak [this message]
2026-07-24 18:10   ` [PATCH v5 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add method to set a new guest AP configuration sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to resume the vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state to STOP Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RUNNING and vice versa Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get the size of data to be migrated during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add 'migratable' feature to sysfs 'features' attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration chapter to vfio-ap.rst Anthony Krowiak
2026-07-24 18:38   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260724161351.1802644-10-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox