From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8F828C037; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785203137; cv=none; b=IYFglxmj+9m1rQ8H+8p5ZPR7i1wKGvh3NtvIx3c2sa1Zaey7sPpxJESjmV8haakVjZupPAfSCnnA8zyTXCtZiqT3BZtno6ArVr19dzzai8qp5+QLyPkhLtpTo4i+d/+fDKhcvfw8aMX/MQF4v/IqRhpNlWFvWcuF1jj4RvkrOzs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785203137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HWKh5jVdVBQVIVFbLMgfhOQ0eaLaLKsjyGHabuSFMZg=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=GCynq8o0ZaxNXE9UrfLF0fjycKfkSxM6fEtScO7NjhSi4KEkQhXjCtHZ58wIbQ2680QV//axxy9HkdNPGcNTbR2zLE3T6BIelQvbowwITwzOJuU1gYTCMX5RbGJVAJZEYyOMtC28scXd81v3gfXnNOHJzszmRASuJ+cKYJMPh7U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=O2PDWu07; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="O2PDWu07" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98821F000E9; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:45:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785203134; bh=HWKh5jVdVBQVIVFbLMgfhOQ0eaLaLKsjyGHabuSFMZg=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=O2PDWu07jA4z+htcMTXvplofBYVFIGeYx/SyoIGMIall/m6xhMm8iq43teO4tEnMk KFcGuZAA4erWe6+AQ9XPJlx0aCm1/53TMchaTS4M7S8n4NTFbjXSQHbnDZZajEr7WX JVllWpYtNyjX9xfhONhIauYcw+liD1/7J0O/OiMM83MQVjLxq3RxwrCPOt9xw232Yf XBOA86f1pTPBHlWGK+uDXcpVWTi+xGl3UVr1WyZ6eytReytcC90MMEgdVD5kmRuAsG zbmXgGvfTCKOTjYwjQPF3Z8Vdvv8Wp1D6O4ggYDmFADZL2DE7RfaH1tknWwl1WAfzO 57JcJMv0gjGXg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/10] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Eric Farman" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Vasily Gorbik" , kvm@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260728013509.1551753-5-farman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260728013509.1551753-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> <20260728013509.1551753-5-farman@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:45:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20260728014533.E98821F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The first IDAW in a list does not need to be on a 2K/4K boundary > like all others, and so is read separately to accurately calculate > the size of the buffer needed to read the full IDAL. >=20 > Verify that the address found in the first IDAW is unchanged between > reads, to ensure a consistent set of IDAWs being worked with. >=20 > Fixes: 01aa26c672c0 ("s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato > Signed-off-by: Eric Farman Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728013509.1551= 753-1-farman@linux.ibm.com?part=3D4