From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:21:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728172126.3F1F91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728170708.294400-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Meaningful code, documentation, and commit message mismatch regarding which lock is used.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 03/13] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() ---
commit 44561620d155e5433777595f8bc3b2d06087934d
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa()
This patch fixes a potential race condition between __do_essa() and the
migration and CMMA state handling functions. It transitions the affected paths
to use the architecture-specific slots lock via scope-based guards.
> KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa()
>
> An unlikely race between __do_essa() and kvm_s390_vm_start_migration(),
> kvm_s390_vm_stop_migration(), or dat_get_cmma() was possible.
>
> Fix by locking kvm->slots_lock. Since this is not a hot path, the
> overhead of an additional mutex is negligible.
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug, but the commit message states the fix uses kvm->slots_lock,
while the code changes actually use kvm->slots_arch_lock. Should the commit
message be updated to reflect the use of the architecture-specific lock?
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 89de085f39670..1952f592a80a1 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1298,7 +1298,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_set_migration(struct kvm *kvm,
> {
> int res = -ENXIO;
>
> - mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> + guard(srcu)(&kvm->srcu);
> + guard(mutex)(&kvm->slots_arch_lock);
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug, but the function documentation for kvm_s390_vm_start_migration()
and kvm_s390_vm_stop_migration() (which are called from here) still states they
must be called with kvm->slots_lock held:
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:kvm_s390_vm_start_migration():
/*
* Must be called with kvm->srcu held to avoid races on memslots, and with
* kvm->slots_lock to avoid races with ourselves, kvm_s390_vm_stop_migration(),
* and kvm_s390_get_cmma_bits().
*/
static int kvm_s390_vm_start_migration(struct kvm *kvm)
Since these paths now use kvm->slots_arch_lock instead, would it be helpful
to update those comments to match the new locking behavior?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728170708.294400-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 17:06 [PATCH v4 00/13] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:21 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() when low on memory Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 17:07 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] KVM: s390: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() for UCONTROL Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-28 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728172126.3F1F91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox