From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Simon Schippers" <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present"
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:26:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729092652.C50E41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728092240.250257-2-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incomplete Revert / Orphaned Memory Barrier
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net 1/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present" ---
commit 18e68b71511b6b4155def5921c5f149c1b6e74e9
Author: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present"
This commit reverts a previous change that stopped the netdev queue when the
ptr_ring is full. It goes back to dropping packets instead, resolving a reported
performance regression in a multicast testcase.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/akVnoOYQOrt8k-Gu@karahi.librecast.net/
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index ffbe6f13fb1fa..ec5573f545af6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1073,33 +1072,13 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> nf_reset_ct(skb);
>
> - queue = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, txq);
> -
> - spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
> - ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb);
> - if (!qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(queue) &&
> - __ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring) == -ENOSPC) {
> - netif_tx_stop_queue(queue);
> - /* Paired with smp_mb() in __tun_wake_queue() */
> - smp_mb__after_atomic();
[Severity: Medium]
Does this revert leave an orphaned memory barrier in __tun_wake_queue()?
Since the producer-side queue stopping logic and smp_mb__after_atomic() were
removed here in tun_net_xmit(), the consumer-side logic in __tun_wake_queue()
now executes an unconditional full memory barrier on every consumed packet:
drivers/net/tun.c:__tun_wake_queue() {
...
/* Paired with smp_mb__after_atomic() in tun_net_xmit() */
smp_mb();
if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) {
...
}
Should the corresponding wakeup logic and smp_mb() in __tun_wake_queue() also
be removed to complete the revert and avoid unnecessary overhead?
> - if (!__ptr_ring_check_produce(&tfile->tx_ring))
> - netif_tx_wake_queue(queue);
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.producer_lock);
> -
> - if (ret) {
> - /* This should be a rare case if a qdisc is present, but
> - * can happen due to lltx.
> - * Since skb_tx_timestamp(), skb_orphan(),
> - * run_ebpf_filter() and pskb_trim() could have tinkered
> - * with the SKB, returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY is unsafe and
> - * we must drop instead.
> - */
> + if (ptr_ring_produce(&tfile->tx_ring, skb)) {
> drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_FULL_RING;
> goto drop;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728092240.250257-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 9:22 [PATCH net 0/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 1/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: avoid ptr_ring tail-drop when a qdisc is present" Simon Schippers
2026-07-29 9:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 2/4] Revert "ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 3/4] Revert "vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 9:22 ` [PATCH net 4/4] Revert "tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup" Simon Schippers
2026-07-28 19:22 ` [PATCH net 0/4] Revert "tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops" Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729092652.C50E41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox