From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] vfio: selftests: Retry on EAGAIN during device reset
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:43:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729134337.2ed84a99@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728-igb_v3_b4-v7-5-4616c3745796@google.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:24:30 +0000
Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com> wrote:
> Add retry logic to vfio_pci_device_reset() to handle the case where PCI
> resets fail due to lock contention, in which case
> pci_try_reset_function() returns -EAGAIN.
>
> Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>
> ---
> .../vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> index 2e67afc0d580..27bdf561925f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio/vfio_pci_device.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
> struct vfio_pci_device *vfio_pci_device_init(const char *bdf, struct iommu *iommu);
> void vfio_pci_device_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_device *device);
>
> +int __vfio_pci_device_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *device);
> void vfio_pci_device_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *device);
>
> void vfio_pci_config_access(struct vfio_pci_device *device, bool write,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> index 7b8394d0ac50..1b29cef96b04 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> #include <dirent.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <libgen.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> @@ -221,9 +222,23 @@ void vfio_pci_config_access(struct vfio_pci_device *device, bool write,
> write ? "write to" : "read from", config);
> }
>
> +int __vfio_pci_device_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *device)
> +{
> + if (ioctl(device->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET, NULL))
> + return -errno;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void vfio_pci_device_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *device)
> {
> - ioctl_assert(device->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET, NULL);
> + int r;
> +
> + do {
> + r = __vfio_pci_device_reset(device);
> + } while (r == -EAGAIN);
> +
> + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(r, 0, "ioctl(device->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET) failed\n");
> }
This has roughly the same unbounded loop issue that Sashiko flagged
waiting for the register level reset to complete, shouldn't we also
introduce a retry cap here? A delay would also help bound that retry
cap versus the instant retry here.
Also, please rebase to linux-next to keep the driver inclusion
consistent with the already merged nv_falcon driver (trivial) and
unblock Sashiko from applying the series for review (more important).
David's R-bs from v6 can also carry forward on the unmodified patches.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 23:24 [PATCH v7 0/6] vfio: selftests: Add driver for Intel Ethernet Gigabit Controller (IGB) Josh Hilke
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] vfio: selftests: igb: Add driver for Intel 82576 device Josh Hilke
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] vfio: selftests: igb: Use PHY internal loopback on 82576 Josh Hilke
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] vfio: selftests: Add helpers to re-enable interrupts Josh Hilke
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] vfio: selftests: igb: Factor hardware programming into igb_hw_init() Josh Hilke
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] vfio: selftests: Retry on EAGAIN during device reset Josh Hilke
2026-07-29 19:43 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2026-07-28 23:24 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] vfio: selftests: igb: Recover after DMA-read faults Josh Hilke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729134337.2ed84a99@shazbot.org \
--to=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox