Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@gmail.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: prevent stale IOTLB after ACCESS_PLATFORM changes
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:55:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730135508.GC1442692@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730040938.1725757-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3065 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 12:09:38PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
> vhost_vsock_set_features() initializes dev->iotlb when
> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is enabled. It does not remove that IOTLB
> when the feature is later cleared. The virtqueue still points at the
> old IOTLB, and vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() passes descriptors to
> vhost_get_vq_desc(), which translates them through that mapping.
> 
> A userspace backend can enable ACCESS_PLATFORM, install an IOTLB entry
> for a payload GPA, start the device, clear ACCESS_PLATFORM, replace the
> memory table, and reuse the old HVA before submitting the same GPA
> again. The feature state then says direct memory access is in use
> while the TX path still uses the old IOTLB HVA.
> 
> Reject clearing ACCESS_PLATFORM while the device IOTLB exists. Also
> keep the existing IOTLB when a feature update leaves ACCESS_PLATFORM
> enabled; VHOST_SET_FEATURES is used for runtime log updates and must
> not discard the current translations by allocating an empty IOTLB.
> 
> Fixes: e13a6915a03f ("vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support")
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index ae01457ea2cd..57e8fd1eb670 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_cid(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 guest_cid)
>  static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> +	int ret = -EFAULT;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (features & ~VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES)
> @@ -809,7 +810,14 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) {
> +	if (!(features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) &&
> +	    vsock->dev.iotlb) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto err;
> +	}

This prevents one problem but there are still other issues with how
feature bit negotiation and the IOTLB are implemented:

1. VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is defined by the VIRTIO spec and must not
   be change after feature bit negotiation. Please reject all feature
   bit updates except VHOST_F_LOG_ALL to comply with the VIRTIO spec and
   eliminate potential bugs in drivers/vhost/vsock.c.

2. When the device is reset, the iotlb cannot be left initialized
   because there is no guarantee that VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM will be
   negotiated again.

> +	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) &&
> +	    !vsock->dev.iotlb) {
>  		if (vhost_init_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev))
>  			goto err;
>  	}
> @@ -827,7 +835,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
>  
>  err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> -	return -EFAULT;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  4:09 [PATCH] vhost/vsock: prevent stale IOTLB after ACCESS_PLATFORM changes Jia Jia
2026-07-30  4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 13:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2026-07-30 14:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-30 14:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730135508.GC1442692@fedora \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox