From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/31] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:08:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731130902.654679-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731130902.654679-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Move the reset of the arm core register into a separate function for
later reuse.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index ea8cac173a0b..727abbff2b6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -169,6 +169,30 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
memset(vcpu->arch.sve_state, 0, vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu));
}
+static void kvm_reset_vcpu_core_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ u32 pstate;
+
+ if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
+ pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
+ else if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
+ pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2;
+ else
+ pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
+
+ memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = 0;
+ *vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu) = 0;
+ memset(kvm_vcpu_get_vregs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*kvm_vcpu_get_vregs(vcpu)));
+ memset(kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*kvm_vcpu_get_fpsr(vcpu)));
+ memset(kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu), 0, sizeof(*kvm_vcpu_get_fpcr(vcpu)));
+ vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt = 0;
+ vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = 0;
+ vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq = 0;
+ vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq = 0;
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
+}
+
/**
* kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
* @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -191,7 +215,6 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_reset_state reset_state;
bool loaded;
- u32 pstate;
spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
reset_state = vcpu->arch.reset_state;
@@ -210,23 +233,8 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
}
- if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
- pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
- else if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
- pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2;
- else
- pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-
/* Reset core registers */
- memset(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu), 0, sizeof(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)));
- *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = 0;
- *vcpu_sp_el0(vcpu) = 0;
- memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.fp_regs));
- vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_abt = 0;
- vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_und = 0;
- vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_irq = 0;
- vcpu->arch.ctxt.spsr_fiq = 0;
- *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
+ kvm_reset_vcpu_core_regs(vcpu);
/* Reset system registers */
kvm_reset_sys_regs(vcpu);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 13:08 [PATCH v5 00/31] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/31] vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 14:54 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 16:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/31] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/31] KVM: Allow KVM implementations to switch off MMIO independent of Kconfig Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/31] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/31] arm64: ptrace: Use constants for compat register numbers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/31] arm64/sysreg: Convert SPSR_ELx to automatic register generation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 14:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-31 14:50 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/31] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/31] KVM: arm64: Use accessor functions for gprs during reset Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-07-31 13:30 ` [PATCH v5 09/31] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/31] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/31] arm64: Share " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/31] KVM: arm64: Share arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/31] KVM: s390: Prepare moving KVM/s390 to arch/s390/kvm/s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/31] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 15/31] KVM: s390: Guard KVM/s390 behind CONFIG_KVM_S390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 16/31] KVM: s390: Move PGM code definitions to asm/kvm_host.h Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 17/31] KVM: s390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 18/31] KVM: s390: gmap: Move storage key and CMMA code to kvm/s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 19/31] KVM: s390: gmap: Move prefix handling " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 20/31] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 21/31] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 22/31] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 23/31] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 24/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 25/31] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 26/31] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 27/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 28/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 29/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 30/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 13:08 ` [PATCH v5 31/31] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-31 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731130902.654679-10-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox