From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: selftests: Affine threads to random CPUs in hardware disable test
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:15:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731171540.7B3FF1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731170619.2620845-7-seanjc@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Randomly selected CPUs are not removed from `allowed_cpu_set`, leading to duplicate selections and artificially reduced test concurrency.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: selftests: Affine threads to random CPUs in hardware disable test ---
commit 093b65b96e15e7cdd5b611bd7d8556fb88cae6e6
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: selftests: Affine threads to random CPUs in hardware disable test
This patch modifies the hardware disable test to affine worker threads
to random CPUs instead of hardcoding them to CPUs 0-3. It also honors
the starting CPU set during this process.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> index d8288147b0a69..bd23c13003707 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c
> @@ -149,12 +149,15 @@ void wait_for_child_setup(pid_t pid)
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> + cpu_set_t allowed_cpu_set;
> u32 i;
> int s, r;
> pid_t pid;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; i++)
> - CPU_SET(i, &threads_cpu_set);
> + kvm_sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &allowed_cpu_set);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM && CPU_COUNT(&allowed_cpu_set); i++)
> + CPU_SET(kvm_pick_random_cpu(&allowed_cpu_set), &threads_cpu_set);
[Severity: Medium]
Since kvm_pick_random_cpu() doesn't clear the selected CPU from
allowed_cpu_set, can the same CPU be selected multiple times here?
Because the selected CPU is not cleared (for example, with CPU_CLR),
threads_cpu_set could end up with fewer than VCPU_NUM unique CPUs. This
might artificially reduce the test's concurrency.
Additionally, the loop condition checks CPU_COUNT(&allowed_cpu_set), but
since allowed_cpu_set is never modified inside the loop, this count
will remain constant. Was there an intention to remove the chosen CPU
from allowed_cpu_set in each iteration?
> sem = sem_open("vm_sem", O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0644, 0);
> sem_unlink("vm_sem");
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731170619.2620845-1-seanjc@google.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 17:06 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: selftests: Add more syscall wrappers, fix hardware_disable_test Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: selftests: Add a KVM syscall wrapper for sched_setaffinity() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: selftests: Set threads CPU affinity before doing work in hardware disable test Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: selftests: Pre-set threads affinity in hardware disable test when possible Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: selftests: Return the target CPU from pin_task_to_random_cpu() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: selftests: Extract picking of random CPU from cpu_set_t to separate API Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: selftests: Affine threads to random CPUs in hardware disable test Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: selftests: Drop unreachable, dead code from " Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: selftests: Add KVM syscall wrapper for pthread_create() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: selftests: Add KVM syscall wrappers for pthread_{cancel,join}() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: selftests: Add helper APIs to cancel+join pthreads Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add KVM syscall wrappers for pthread_{g,s}etaffinity_np() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-31 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: selftests: Clean up global constants in hardware disable test Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731171540.7B3FF1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox