Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/13] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 13:01:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803130141.D31391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803124040.126471-7-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Concurrent large page split causes `large_crste_to_phys()` to dereference an invalid address (`-1`), leading to a host kernel panic via addressing exception.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v8 06/13] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace ---
commit 7bad2118b8960be854e59fc638949bdda1bbace0
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace

This commit fixes several key and CMMA operations to return -EFAULT instead
of PGM_ADDRESSING when acting outside of a memslot.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c b/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> index ed4259d176295..171b619599089 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> @@ -771,21 +773,23 @@ int dat_reset_reference_bit(union asce asce, gfn_t gfn)
>  
>  		if (!crste.h.fc || !crste.s.fc1.pr)
>  			return 0;
> -		return page_reset_referenced(large_crste_to_phys(*crstep, gfn));
> +		skey->skey = page_reset_referenced(large_crste_to_phys(*crstep, gfn)) << 1;

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential race condition with
the large page handling here.

Because kvm->mmu_lock is only held for reading during this operation, could
another vCPU concurrently split the large page under the read lock (via
dat_split_crste()), clearing the fc bit?

If dat_entry_walk() succeeds, but the page is split before the implicit read
of *crstep in large_crste_to_phys(), large_crste_to_phys() could observe the
cleared fc bit and return -1. 

Passing -1 to the assembly block inside page_reset_referenced() could
trigger an unhandled addressing exception and panic the host kernel since it
lacks exception tables.

Would it be safer to use the already validated snapshot (crste) instead of
dereferencing *crstep again?

skey->skey = page_reset_referenced(large_crste_to_phys(crste, gfn)) << 1;

This same pattern of passing *crstep directly to large_crste_to_phys()
appears to also exist in dat_set_storage_key() and
dat_cond_set_storage_key().

> +		return 0;
>  	}
>  	old = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
>  	pgste = old;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803124040.126471-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 12:40 [PATCH v8 00/13] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] KVM: s390: Do not free SCA if it was not allocated Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 14:08   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-03 14:13   ` Janosch Frank
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 14:30   ` Janosch Frank
2026-08-03 14:54     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 14:50   ` Janosch Frank
2026-08-03 15:03     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 12:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal is pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 12:40 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 13:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 15:06   ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803130141.D31391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox