From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: memory leak in guest debug handling
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:29:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804122904.8540A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804120631.736919-4-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] In `kvm_s390_import_bp_data()`, if importing a hardware watchpoint fails on a subsequent iteration, the dynamically allocated `old_data` buffers from watchpoints imported in previous iterations are permanently leaked.
- [High] The KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl calls `read_guest_abs()` (which internally accesses KVM memslots) without holding the `kvm->srcu` lock, violating KVM memslot locking rules and risking a Use-After-Free.
- [High] Leak of hardware watchpoint and breakpoint structures upon vCPU destruction because `kvm_s390_clear_bp_data()` is never called in the vCPU teardown path.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: memory leak in guest debug handling ---
commit 56d3bf3acb3de4323dcc94259c523dacec14841e
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: memory leak in guest debug handling
bp_data is freed only for the error case by kfree(bp_data).
Every successful KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG will leak bp_data.
Fixes: 27291e2165b6 ("KVM: s390: hardware support for guest debugging")
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> index 69835e1d4f207..4c02dbebb2eb3 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ int kvm_s390_import_bp_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu->arch.guestdbg.hw_bp_info = bp_info;
> vcpu->arch.guestdbg.nr_hw_wp = nr_wp;
> vcpu->arch.guestdbg.hw_wp_info = wp_info;
> + kfree(bp_data);
> return 0;
> error:
> kfree(bp_data);
> kfree(wp_info);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do we also leak the dynamically allocated
old_data buffers for watchpoints on this error path?
When iterating over the breakpoints, if a later hardware watchpoint fails
validation, the function jumps to this error path. It frees the wp_info
array, but does not appear to loop over the already processed wp_info
elements to free the wp_info->old_data buffers that were allocated in
__import_wp_info().
Could an unprivileged user trigger this error path repeatedly to exhaust
memory?
> kfree(bp_info);
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does read_guest_abs() get called without
holding the kvm->srcu lock when importing watchpoints?
arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c:__import_wp_info() {
...
wp_info->old_data = kmalloc(bp_data->len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
...
ret = read_guest_abs(vcpu, wp_info->phys_addr, wp_info->old_data,
wp_info->len);
...
}
The KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG ioctl takes vcpu->mutex but not kvm->srcu. The call
chain __import_wp_info() -> read_guest_abs() -> kvm_read_guest() ->
gfn_to_memslot() expects kvm->srcu to be held to prevent use-after-free if
a memslot is concurrently removed. Should the SRCU lock be acquired before
reading guest memory here?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do we leak the guest debug structures if a
vCPU is destroyed while debugging is still enabled?
arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c:kvm_s390_import_bp_data() {
...
vcpu->arch.guestdbg.hw_bp_info = bp_info;
vcpu->arch.guestdbg.nr_hw_wp = nr_wp;
vcpu->arch.guestdbg.hw_wp_info = wp_info;
...
}
If the userspace VMM process exits or crashes, kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy() is
called. However, kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy() in arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c does not
appear to call kvm_s390_clear_bp_data() to clean up these dynamically
allocated arrays.
Would it be possible for an attacker to exhaust host memory by repeatedly
spawning and destroying debug-enabled VMs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804120631.736919-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 12:06 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: more fixes Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: s390: remove user triggerable WARN_ON Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:24 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-04 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: s390: zero initialize irq for inject_pfault_token Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 12:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 13:28 ` Matthew Rosato
[not found] ` <20260804120631.736919-4-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
2026-08-04 12:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: memory leak in guest debug handling Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804122904.8540A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox