From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Qi Zhang" <marsy12010123@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Protect virtualization-enable VM walks with RCU
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:51:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804125109.B20491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804123243.2213854-1-marsy12010123@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Data race on `vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment` during CPU hotplug can lead to guest timekeeping corruption.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Protect virtualization-enable VM walks with RCU ---
commit ff5afc2b0cb8750aad6e3a35f5b08c17dc92aca8
Author: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
KVM: x86: Protect virtualization-enable VM walks with RCU
This commit protects the vm_list walks in kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu()
with RCU. It publishes and removes VMs using RCU list operations to prevent
use-after-free bugs during CPU hotplug concurrent with VM teardown.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index afcac1042947a..fb1c14d7dc4b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -13192,7 +13193,7 @@ int kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu(void)
> */
> if (backwards_tsc) {
> u64 delta_cyc = max_tsc - local_tsc;
> - list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
> kvm->arch.backwards_tsc_observed = true;
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment += delta_cyc;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lockless addition race with a
concurrent kvm_arch_vcpu_load() on a running VM?
During CPU hotplug, the hotplug thread iterates over all vCPUs and modifies
tsc_offset_adjustment here locklessly. Concurrently, if the VM is scheduled
on another active CPU, kvm_arch_vcpu_load() could read and clear
vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment to 0.
Could this data race result in a lost or corrupted TSC adjustment,
potentially warping the guest's timekeeping?
> }
> }
>
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804123243.2213854-1-marsy12010123@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 12:32 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Protect virtualization-enable VM walks with RCU Qi Zhang
2026-08-04 12:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804125109.B20491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marsy12010123@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox