From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: Fix old_data leak in guest debug error path
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 18:19:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804181920.B70211F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804162435.28617-6-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing SRCU read lock around KVM memslot access during KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG causes a Use-After-Free vulnerability.
- [High] Pre-existing memory leak of guest debug arrays (`hw_wp_info`, `hw_bp_info`) and per-watchpoint `old_data` buffers on vCPU destruction.
- [High] Integer truncation of `bp_data->len` allows unconstrained memory allocation, leading to a kernel WARNING and potential Denial of Service.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: Fix old_data leak in guest debug error path ---
commit a3583776c5b24b471704343b4d20b599ed4ab8ca
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fix old_data leak in guest debug error path
__import_wp_info() allocates a per-watchpoint old_data buffer to back up
the original guest memory contents. If a later watchpoint of the same
KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG request fails to import, kvm_s390_import_bp_data()
jumps to the error label, which frees the wp_info array but not the
old_data buffers of the entries that were imported successfully.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> index 4c02dbebb2eb3..f7c94d54efbe2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int kvm_s390_import_bp_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> ret = __import_wp_info(vcpu, &bp_data[i],
> &wp_info[nr_wp]);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this call path lack SRCU protection?
When KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG calls __import_wp_info(), it eventually invokes
read_guest_abs() which dereferences the KVM memslots array via
gfn_to_memslot().
Neither kvm_vcpu_ioctl() nor kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug() appears
to acquire the kvm->srcu read lock. Can a concurrent
KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION ioctl free the memslot structure while it is
being accessed, triggering a use-after-free?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there an integer truncation bug inside
__import_wp_info() for the length parameter?
bp_data->len is a 64-bit user-controlled value, which is assigned to
wp_info->len (a 32-bit signed int):
arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c:__import_wp_info() {
...
wp_info->len = bp_data->len;
...
if (wp_info->len < 0 || wp_info->len > MAX_WP_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
wp_info->old_data = kmalloc(bp_data->len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
...
}
By providing a large 64-bit value (e.g., 0x100000005), the lower 32 bits
would pass the bounds check (5 <= MAX_WP_SIZE), but the untruncated 64-bit
value is then passed to kmalloc().
Can this lead to an unbounded memory allocation exceeding MAX_PAGE_ORDER,
triggering a kernel warning?
> if (ret)
> - goto error;
> + goto error_wp;
> nr_wp++;
> break;
[ ... ]
> @@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ int kvm_s390_import_bp_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu->arch.guestdbg.hw_wp_info = wp_info;
> kfree(bp_data);
> return 0;
> +
> +error_wp:
> + while (nr_wp--)
> + kfree(wp_info[nr_wp].old_data);
> error:
> kfree(bp_data);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy() leak these
dynamically allocated buffers when tearing down a vCPU?
If the VM is destroyed while guest debugging is active,
kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy() seems to skip calling kvm_s390_clear_bp_data()
to free hw_wp_info, hw_bp_info, and the old_data buffers:
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy() {
...
VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 3, "%s", "free cpu");
...
}
Could a host userspace process repeatedly create and destroy vCPUs with
guest debug enabled to exhaust host memory?
> kfree(wp_info);
> kfree(bp_info);
> return ret;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804162435.28617-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: s390: more fixes Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: Remove user triggerable WARN_ON Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 16:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 17:47 ` Douglas Freimuth
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: s390: Zero initialize data structures for inject_pfault_token Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 17:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: s390: Zero initialize irq in reinject_machine_check Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 17:18 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-04 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: s390: Fix memory leak in guest debug handling Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 18:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: Fix old_data leak in guest debug error path Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 17:19 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-04 18:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: s390: Take srcu when importing watchpoint data Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 8:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: s390: Free guest debug data on vcpu destroy Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 20:03 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804181920.B70211F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox