From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: s390: Zero initialize data structures for inject_pfault_token
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:31:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805113136.CCC791F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805110455.7200-3-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Invalid Free / Kernel Panic in kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check() due to kfree() on a stack pointer.
- [High] Stack Information Leak to userspace in kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check() during local machine check reinjection.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: s390: Zero initialize data structures for inject_pfault_token ---
commit 99d37a57e11716f103a611788767010736475aa3
Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Zero initialize data structures for inject_pfault_token
This commit fixes a stack information leak by zero-initializing the
kvm_s390_interrupt and kvm_s390_irq structures in
__kvm_inject_pfault_token. This prevents stale stack values from leaking to
host userspace via migration ioctls.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 518a69c55e85c..611dcb5342101 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -4474,8 +4474,8 @@ int kvm_s390_try_set_tod_clock(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_s390_vm_tod_clo
> static void __kvm_inject_pfault_token(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool start_token,
> unsigned long token)
> {
> - struct kvm_s390_interrupt inti;
> - struct kvm_s390_irq irq;
> + struct kvm_s390_interrupt inti = {};
> + struct kvm_s390_irq irq = {};
> struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti_mem = NULL;
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing this fix,
I noticed a similar pre-existing issue in arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c that
appears to pass a stack pointer to kfree().
In kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check(), a stack-allocated interrupt info
structure is passed to __inject_vm():
kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check() {
...
struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info inti;
...
rc = __inject_vm(vcpu->kvm, &inti);
When the machine check is a floating machine check, this routes to
__inject_float_mchk(), which unconditionally frees the pointer:
__inject_float_mchk() {
...
kfree(inti);
Could this result in a kernel panic if a nested guest execution triggers
this path, attempting to free a stack-allocated variable?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but I noticed another potential stack
information leak in arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c.
Does kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check() leak uninitialized stack memory
during local machine check reinjection?
kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check() {
...
struct kvm_s390_irq irq;
...
kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &irq);
Because irq is uninitialized on the stack, the padding and fixed_logout
array contain stale data. __inject_mchk() then copies this data into the
persistent vCPU state:
__inject_mchk() {
...
memcpy(&mchk->fixed_logout, &irq->u.mchk.fixed_logout,
sizeof(mchk->fixed_logout));
Later, when userspace retrieves the interrupt state, store_local_irq()
copies it back out:
store_local_irq() {
...
irq->u.mchk = li->irq.mchk;
Could this allow a host userspace process to access uninitialized kernel
stack memory via the KVM migration ioctls, similar to the issue fixed in
this patch?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805110455.7200-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 11:04 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: s390: More fixes Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: s390: Remove user triggerable WARN_ON Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: s390: Zero initialize data structures for inject_pfault_token Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: s390: Zero initialize irq in reinject_machine_check Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: s390: Fix memory leak in guest debug handling Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: s390: Fix old_data leak in guest debug error path Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: s390: Take srcu when importing watchpoint data Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: s390: Free guest debug data on vcpu destroy Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: s390: Fix length check __import_wp_info() Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-05 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: s390: More fixes Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805113136.CCC791F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox