From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Chinmay Rath <rathc@linux.ibm.com>,
Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] target/ppc/kvm: Use host compatibility mode for nested guests
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 20:03:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805195553.784a407c-48-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bce28234-2d74-8a2d-d21f-ff1844147441@eik.bme.hu>
Hi BALATON,
Thanks for reviewing this patch. Please find my response inline below.
On 2026/08/04 09:55 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > On POWER systems, the host CPU may run in a compatibility mode (e.g.,
> > a Power11 processor operating in Power10 compatibility mode). When
> > running nested KVM guests, QEMU currently derives the host CPU type
> > using mfpvr(), which reflects the physical processor version. This can
> > result in a mismatch between the CPU model used by QEMU and the
> > compatibility mode enforced by the host, leading to guest boot failures
> > such as "KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements".
> >
> > Update kvm_ppc_get_host_cpu_class() to check if the host is running in
> > a compatibility mode using kvm_ppc_host_compat_pvr(). When available,
> > use the compatibility PVR instead of the raw hardware PVR when selecting
> > the CPU model. This ensures that QEMU selects a CPU model consistent
> > with the host compatibility mode, allowing nested guests to boot
> > correctly.
> >
> > The guard uses #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) to prevent build breakage on
> > ppc32 targets where the POWER9/10/11 PVR constants are not defined.
> >
> > Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > No changes in this version.
> >
> > target/ppc/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > index d4c5601a00c4..aa8269186a1a 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,18 @@ PowerPCCPUClass *kvm_ppc_get_host_cpu_class(void)
> > uint32_t host_pvr = mfpvr();
> > PowerPCCPUClass *pvr_pcc;
> >
> > +#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_KVM
> > +#error "CONFIG_KVM is not enabled"
> > +#endif
>
> In meson.build:
>
> ppc_system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_KVM', if_true: files('kvm.c'))
>
> so I think this check and #error does not make sense.
You're right that kvm.c is always compiled with CONFIG_KVM enabled due
to the meson.build constraint, so the #ifndef CONFIG_KVM / #error check
can never fire. I added it as an explicit compile-time assertion to
document the assumption, but it is redundant given the build system
already enforces it. I'll drop it in the next version.
Thanks,
Amit
>
> Regards,
> BALATON Zoltan
>
> > + uint32_t compat_host_pvr;
> > +
> > + compat_host_pvr = kvm_ppc_host_compat_pvr();
> > + if (compat_host_pvr) {
> > + host_pvr = compat_host_pvr;
> > + }
> > +#endif /* TARGET_PPC64 */
> > +
> > pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr(host_pvr);
> > if (pvr_pcc == NULL) {
> > pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask(host_pvr);
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 18:29 [PATCH v5 0/3] ppc/kvm: Handle CPU compatibility mode correctly for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] [DO_NOT_MERGE] linux-headers: Add uapi header changes Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] target/ppc/kvm: Add support for querying host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] target/ppc/kvm: Use host compatibility mode for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 19:55 ` BALATON Zoltan
2026-08-05 14:33 ` Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-08-05 8:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ppc/kvm: Handle CPU compatibility mode correctly " Anushree Mathur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805195553.784a407c-48-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rathc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox