From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Zhang" <yuz08559@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vduse: reject non-coherent iotlb entries in the coherent fault path
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 02:27:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808022719.9E5301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807022657.11318-1-yuz08559@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the patch fails to completely mitigate the pre-existing arbitrary physical memory read/write vulnerability because an attacker can map the VDUSE domain file descriptor and use it to trivially bypass the new backing file check.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] vduse: reject non-coherent iotlb entries in the coherent fault path ---
commit f4c50be37a9ca120f63ebae4dfab39a075d198c4
Author: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
vduse: reject non-coherent iotlb entries in the coherent fault path
This commit attempts to fix a vulnerability where non-coherent IOTLB entries
are treated as physical addresses in the coherent fault path. It introduces a
check to ensure the backing file of the IOTLB entry matches the domain's file,
assuming only valid coherent mappings use this file.
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> index b6c958224b7ce..aee0ae1c408e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -234,6 +235,17 @@ vduse_domain_get_coherent_page(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain, u64 iova)
> if (!map)
> goto out;
>
> + /*
> + * Only coherent allocations made by this domain are backed by a real
> + * struct page here: their map->addr is a physical address and their
> + * backing file is the domain's own anon inode. Entries installed via a
> + * vhost IOTLB message on a use_va device instead carry a userspace
> + * virtual address in map->addr, and must never be fed to pfn_to_page().
> + */
> + map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
> + if (map_file->file != domain->file)
> + goto out;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this check completely mitigate the
vulnerability?
An attacker can obtain the domain->file descriptor via the VDUSE_IOTLB_GET_FD2
ioctl and mmap() it into their address space. If they use this new virtual
address in a VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE message, vhost_vdpa_va_map() will assign this
same domain->file to the mapping's vm_file.
When the attacker triggers a page fault on this IOVA in
vduse_domain_get_coherent_page(), map_file->file will match domain->file,
successfully passing this check. The kernel will then pass the attacker's
arbitrary virtual address to pfn_to_page(), allowing them to regain arbitrary
physical memory read/write access.
> +
> page = pfn_to_page((map->addr + iova - map->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> get_page(page);
> out:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807022657.11318-1-yuz08559@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 2:26 [PATCH] vduse: reject non-coherent iotlb entries in the coherent fault path Yu Zhang
2026-08-08 2:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808022719.9E5301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yuz08559@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox