Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sandipan Das" <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add mediated PMU capability flags
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:29:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810102906.EA9B71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ee8548572f74a2ded7e2904e222045c257a9812.1786345201.git.sandipan.das@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Transient failure in `perf_create_mediated_pmu` permanently clears `mediated_pmu_caps`, corrupting VM capability state on retry.
- [Medium] `kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu_caps` evaluates to true if *any* capability matches, rather than *all*.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add mediated PMU capability flags ---
commit b775f5357bd23699130ac68abbdd7cd26849e026
Author: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>

KVM: x86/pmu: Add mediated PMU capability flags

This commit introduces VM-scoped mediated PMU capability flags to help KVM
determine available hardware assists for saving and restoring guest PMU
state. It defines flags for hardware-switched and hardware-filtered PMU
states, and manages these capabilities during VM initialization.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> index a5821d7c87f93..f60856c48462b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -88,6 +88,26 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return enable_mediated_pmu && vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->version;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu_caps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 caps)
> +{
> +	return kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu(vcpu) &&
> +	       !!(vcpu->kvm->arch.mediated_pmu_caps & caps);

[Severity: Medium]
When a caller checks for multiple capabilities simultaneously, will this
return true if only one of the bits matches, rather than all requested bits?

If a future caller checks kvm_vcpu_has_mediated_pmu_caps() with multiple
flags, it appears it would return true even if only a subset of those flags
are present in mediated_pmu_caps.

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index afcac1042947a..9f0e072ff466d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -12759,6 +12759,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>  		if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
>  			r = perf_create_mediated_pmu();
>  			if (r) {
> +				kvm->arch.mediated_pmu_caps = 0;

[Severity: High]
If perf_create_mediated_pmu() returns a transient error like -EBUSY, is it
safe to permanently clear the VM-wide mediated_pmu_caps here?

If userspace receives the error, resolves the host perf conflict, and
retries the KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl, the retry might succeed but the VM's
capabilities will have been irreversibly wiped. Does this lead to a silent
downgrade to software switching for the VM on a successful retry?

>  				pr_warn_ratelimited(PERF_MEDIATED_PMU_MSG);
>  				return r;
>  			}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1786345201.git.sandipan.das@amd.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 10:14 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Add support for hardware-switched mediated PMU Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add mediated PMU capability flags Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add PMU ops for vendor state sync Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support for hardware-switched PMU Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/cpufeatures: Add PerfCtrVirt feature bit Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: SVM: Add VMCB fields for PMC virtualization Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: SVM: Add support for hardware-switched PMU Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: nSVM: " Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 10:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: SEV: Disallow the use of " Sandipan Das
2026-08-10 10:40   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810102906.EA9B71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox