From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs()
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:55:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812105557.E4D621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812104436.109741-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference due to a TOCTOU data race on `gi->origin`.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() ---
commit b1b05a4cfd3db133f1eddf2ecf286b6b12e10c50
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs()
This commit modifies the reporting of floating interrupts to userspace
to use a non-destructive test. It ensures that the GISA IPM bits are
not inadvertently cleared and lost if the userspace output buffer is
too small.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2242,7 +2247,7 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_nolock;
> }
> - if (gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(gi->origin, i)) {
> + if (gisa_test_ipm_gisc(gi->origin, i)) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for gi->origin to be
dereferenced as NULL here?
Looking at get_all_floating_irqs(), gi->origin is accessed multiple times
without lock protection or READ_ONCE(). The pointer is initially checked
earlier in the function:
if (gi->origin && gisa_get_ipm(gi->origin)) {
and then accessed repeatedly inside the loop for each ISC.
Could the compiler reload the gi->origin pointer from memory between the
initial check and these loop iterations?
If a concurrent KVM_PV_ENABLE ioctl is invoked, it can execute
kvm_s390_pv_init_vm() -> kvm_s390_cpus_to_pv() -> kvm_s390_gisa_disable() ->
kvm_s390_gisa_destroy(), which sets gi->origin = NULL.
Since the KVM_DEV_FLIC_GET_ALL_IRQS ioctl does not hold kvm->lock, could
this concurrent clearing lead to a NULL pointer dereference if the compiler
reloads gi->origin inside the loop?
> irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *) &buf[n];
> irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_IO(1, 0, 0, 0);
> irq->u.io.io_int_word = isc_to_int_word(i);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812104436.109741-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 10:44 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: s390: And then... even more fixes again Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: s390: Properly handle NULL pointer in dat_cond_set_storage_key() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: s390: Use srcu in kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:02 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 10:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 14:06 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 11:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 11:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] KVM: s390: Fix pgste_get_trylock_multiple() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:11 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: s390: Fix IRQ injection with SIGP Stop and Store Status Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 12:59 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:11 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 13:23 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_clear_pv_state() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:02 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: s390: Fix potential tiny kernel stack leak Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:14 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 11:47 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812105557.E4D621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox