From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:05:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812120600.642781F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812115139.576303-4-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing TOCTOU race condition in `vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue` allowing NULL pointer dereference in `status_show`.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects ---
commit 431e0fcd6b2e0bbf72d273210e68aa6e049eacc3
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects
This commit fixes missing locks needed when traversing or modifying the
ap_matrix_mdev object list in the vfio_ap driver. It ensures guests_lock
is properly held during probe and status reads to prevent concurrent list
access issues.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e382e5a1cb996..5c14ded4fd8ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2316,6 +2318,7 @@ static ssize_t status_show(struct device *dev,
> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> struct ap_device *apdev = to_ap_dev(dev);
>
> + mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->guests_lock);
> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->mdevs_lock);
> q = dev_get_drvdata(&apdev->device);
> matrix_mdev = vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue(q);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lead to a NULL pointer
dereference if the sysfs file is read concurrently during probe?
Looking at vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(), the sysfs group is created before
the driver data is initialized and set:
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c:vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue() {
...
ret = sysfs_create_group(&apdev->device.kobj, &vfio_queue_attr_group);
if (ret)
return ret;
q = kzalloc(sizeof(*q), GFP_KERNEL);
...
dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, q);
}
If status_show() is called right after the sysfs group is created but
before dev_set_drvdata() is called, dev_get_drvdata() will return NULL.
The NULL pointer is then passed directly to vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue(), which
unconditionally dereferences it:
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c:vfio_ap_mdev_for_queue() {
...
unsigned long apid = AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn);
...
}
Should there be a check for q being NULL in status_show(), or should the
sysfs group creation be moved after the queue is fully initialized?
>
> /* If the queue is assigned to the matrix mediated device, then
> * determine whether it is passed through to a guest; otherwise,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812115139.576303-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 11:51 [PATCH v3 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 11:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 12:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812120600.642781F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox