From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Create helpers to alloc and free vsie_pages
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:04:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812140415.E04BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812-vsie-sigpi-v4-8-f19e49666315@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] When KVM recycles a `vsie_page` for a nested guest, it only zeros the `scb_s` field, leaving the `crycb` struct retaining data from previous executions. If an L1 guest runs an L2 guest with a format 2 CRYCB, `setup_apcb11()` populates the full `apcb1` array. If the page is subsequently recycled for an L2 guest with a format 0 or 1 CRYCB, `setup_apcb10()` only overwrites the first elements (`apm[0]`, `aqm[0]`, `adm[0]`). Since KVM unconditionally sets `CRYCB_FORMAT2` for the shadow SCB, the hardware reads the full `apcb1` array, unintentionally granting the second nested guest AP (crypto) permissions from the first guest.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v4 08/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Create helpers to alloc and free vsie_pages ---
commit 14607902bebe42835f13bc9f13b042b6aeeaca0f
Author: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: vsie: Create helpers to alloc and free vsie_pages
This commit encapsulates the allocation and freeing of vsie_page
structures into their own helper methods. This refactoring enables these
operations to be called from multiple code paths.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index c935a375f57ca..805d28f0e7058 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1558,9 +1576,9 @@ static struct vsie_page *get_vsie_page(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long addr)
> if (vsie_page->scb_gpa != ULONG_MAX)
> radix_tree_delete(&kvm->arch.vsie.addr_to_page,
> vsie_page->scb_gpa >> 9);
> + /* Mark it as invalid until it resides in the tree. */
> + vsie_page->scb_gpa = ULONG_MAX;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but when a vsie_page is recycled here in
get_vsie_page(), only the scb_s field is zeroed later in the function:
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c:get_vsie_page() {
...
memset(&vsie_page->scb_s, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_sie_block));
...
}
The crycb struct at offset 0x06f8 is left uninitialized and retains data
from previous guests.
If an L1 guest runs an L2 guest with CRYCB_FORMAT2, setup_apcb11()
populates the full apcb1 array. If the page is subsequently recycled by
get_vsie_page() for an L2 guest with CRYCB_FORMAT1, setup_apcb10() only
overwrites the first elements:
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c:setup_apcb10() {
...
apcb_s->apm[0] = apcb_h->apm[0] & tmp.apm[0];
apcb_s->aqm[0] = apcb_h->aqm[0] & tmp.aqm[0] & 0xffff000000000000UL;
apcb_s->adm[0] = apcb_h->adm[0] & tmp.adm[0] & 0xffff000000000000UL;
...
}
Because shadow_crycb() sets CRYCB_FORMAT2 unconditionally in the shadow SCB:
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c:shadow_crycb() {
...
scb_s->crycbd = (u32)virt_to_phys(&vsie_page->crycb) | CRYCB_FORMAT2;
...
}
Will the hardware read the full apcb1 array, unintentionally granting the
second nested guest AP (crypto) permissions from the first guest?
> - /* Mark it as invalid until it resides in the tree. */
> - vsie_page->scb_gpa = ULONG_MAX;
>
> /* Double use of the same address or allocation failure. */
> if (radix_tree_insert(&kvm->arch.vsie.addr_to_page, addr >> 9, vsie_page)) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812-vsie-sigpi-v4-0-f19e49666315@linux.ibm.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 13:52 [PATCH v4 00/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE SIGP ECALL and SRSI Interpretation Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add SCAO read and write helpers Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Move SCAO validation into a function Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add vsie_interp_extf detection Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add ssca_block and ssca_entry structs Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 13:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Move pin/unpin_scb methods Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Move pin/unpin guest page Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Move release/acquire gmap shadow Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Create helpers to alloc and free vsie_pages Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Replace radix_tree with xarray addr_to_page Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add helper to release gmap shadow Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Lazily keep original scb pinned after vsie exit Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add helper to pin and unpin multiple guest pages Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add struct vsie_sca with pin and unpin methods Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Shadow VSIE SCA in guest-1 Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 16:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Guard against invalid CPU address Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 16:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Allow guest-3 cpu add and remove with ssca Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE max shadow configuration Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE shadow stat counters Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 17:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Create minimal scb shadows for not running g3 blocks Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] KVM: s390: vsie: Enable use of VSIE SSCA Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-12 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812140415.E04BE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox