From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gautam Menghani" <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/perf: Use the aggregate context switch values from vcpu struct
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:58:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813095851.4D9CD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813094535.10083-3-gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Task-bound PMU events cache a stale vCPU pointer, resulting in tracking the wrong vCPU.
- [High] CPU-wide and system-wide PMU events are broken and silently report 0 if added when no guest is running.
- [High] Uninitialized event state on task migration leaks stale vCPU pointers.
- [Medium] Unbalanced disablement of the global hardware PMU counters.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Dereferencing `kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu` leads to a Use-After-Free if the previously running VM has been destroyed.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/perf: Use the aggregate context switch values from vcpu struct ---
commit e328e1f6c8baf0140410c1983f559e87d1d0efdc
Author: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
powerpc/perf: Use the aggregate context switch values from vcpu struct
This commit aims to fix inaccurate vpa-pmu counter reporting during vCPU
migrations and when vCPUs are not running by fetching aggregate values
from the vcpu struct instead of relying on the host cpu's PACA.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/vpa-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/vpa-pmu.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/vpa-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/vpa-pmu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -99,19 +99,19 @@ static unsigned long get_counter_data(struct perf_event *event)
> switch (config) {
> case L1_TO_L2_CS_LAT:
> if (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
> - data = kvmhv_get_l1_to_l2_cs_time_vcpu();
> + data = vcpu->arch.l1_to_l2_cs;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dereferencing the vcpu pointer here
lead to a use-after-free if the previously running VM has been destroyed?
When KVM exits a guest, it does not clear local_paca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu,
leaving a dangling pointer in the host's PACA.
The PMU driver reads this dangling pointer in vpa_pmu_add() and permanently
caches it in event->pmu_private. Subsequent calls to vpa_pmu_read() pass
this cached pointer to get_counter_data(), which dereferences the freed
memory here.
> else
> data = kvmhv_get_l1_to_l2_cs_time();
> break;
[ ... ]
> @@ -126,21 +126,33 @@ static int vpa_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> {
> u64 data;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> + vcpu = local_paca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu;
> + if (!vcpu)
> + goto out;
[Severity: High]
Does this early exit break CPU-wide and system-wide profiling?
If a user initiates a CPU-wide profiling session (e.g. perf stat -a) and no
guest is actively running on that specific CPU at that moment, vcpu is NULL.
The function exits early returning 0 without initializing event->pmu_private
or event->hw.prev_count.
Subsequent calls to vpa_pmu_read() check if (!vcpu) and immediately return,
silently leaving the event counter permanently at 0.
[Severity: High]
Could this early exit also leak state from a previous CPU when a task
migrates?
When a task with a vpa_pmu event migrates to a new CPU, perf core calls
pmu->del on the old CPU and pmu->add on the new CPU. If vcpu is NULL on the
new CPU, it returns 0 (success) but jumps to out without updating or
clearing event->pmu_private.
The event silently retains the old vcpu pointer and prev_count from the
previous CPU, resulting in corrupted profiling data calculated against an
unrelated CPU's context.
[Severity: Medium]
Are the global hardware PMU counters skipped here on early bailout, leading
to an unbalanced disablement later?
If a user creates a PMU event on a CPU where no vCPU is active, this early
exit skips calling kvmhv_set_l2_counters_status(cpu, true).
However, when the event is deleted or scheduled out, vpa_pmu_del()
unconditionally calls kvmhv_set_l2_counters_status(cpu, false). This
unbalanced behavior forcefully disables the hardware counters even when they
were never enabled, which could break legitimate concurrent KVM tracing
sessions.
> +
> + event->pmu_private = vcpu;
[Severity: High]
Is it possible caching the vcpu pointer here results in tracking the wrong
vCPU for task-bound events?
When a user creates a task-bound vpa_pmu perf event, the core perf
subsystem calls vpa_pmu_add() during perf_event_context_sched_in(). At this
point, the task has been scheduled but has not yet invoked the KVM_RUN
ioctl.
Because of this, local_paca->kvm_hstate.kvm_vcpu does not point to the
incoming task's vCPU; it contains a stale pointer to the last vCPU that
executed on this physical host CPU. Caching this pointer permanently means
the event tracks unrelated data.
> kvmhv_set_l2_counters_status(smp_processor_id(), true);
>
> - data = get_counter_data(event);
> + data = get_counter_data(vcpu, event);
> local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, data);
>
> +out:
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813094535.10083-1-gautam@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 9:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] powerpc/perf: Fix vpa-pmu driver to report correct numbers Gautam Menghani
2026-08-13 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Maintain aggregate context switch values for vCPUs Gautam Menghani
2026-08-13 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/perf: Use the aggregate context switch values from vcpu struct Gautam Menghani
2026-08-13 9:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 9:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/perf: Update prev_count of event to get accurate values Gautam Menghani
2026-08-13 10:01 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813095851.4D9CD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox