From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jinyu Tang" <jinyu.tang@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: riscv: Implement KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:04:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814120445.3324C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814114507.583424-2-jinyu.tang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY ioctl handler loops infinitely in the kernel if it encounters a HWPOISON page and the userspace thread has blocked SIGBUS.
- [Medium] kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory() can silently skip requested pages and report false progress when mapping a split THP page.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Infinite VMExit page fault loop when a guest accesses an unaligned THP address on a split page table.
- [High] Physical page table leak when overwriting a lower-level page table directory with a huge page leaf PTE.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: riscv: Implement KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY ---
commit ac8ca417e02ba68eb7b7c58fbc637ee417dc2c72
Author: Jinyu Tang <jinyu.tang@linux.dev>
KVM: riscv: Implement KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY
This commit introduces the KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY ioctl handler for RISC-V.
It reuses the existing G-stage fault mapping path with a read access to
populate KVM page tables before running a vCPU, looping until a mapping
is installed or an exit condition is met.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
> index b0474fcf065aa..ebd1e8a4b9e38 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,9 @@ int kvm_riscv_gstage_map_page(...)
> } else if (ALIGN_DOWN(PFN_PHYS(pte_pfn(ptep_get(ptep))), page_size) == hpa) {
> kvm_riscv_gstage_update_pte_prot(gstage, ptep_level, gpa, ptep, prot);
> + out_map->addr = ALIGN_DOWN(gpa, page_size);
> + out_map->level = ptep_level;
> + out_map->pte = ptep_get(ptep);
> return 0;
> }
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this lead to an
infinite VMExit loop when a guest accesses an unaligned THP address on
a split page table?
During fault handling, transparent_hugepage_adjust() in kvm_riscv_mmu_map()
can silently overwrite the original faulting gpa with the 2MB-aligned
base address.
If the G-stage page table is currently split into 4KB PTEs, this block in
kvm_riscv_gstage_map_page() intentionally updates only the 4KB PTE at the
newly aligned gpa. The originally faulting 4KB page remains unmapped,
causing the guest to immediately fault again upon resumption.
[ ... ]
> out_map->pte = pfn_pte(PFN_DOWN(hpa), prot);
> out_map->pte = pte_mkdirty(out_map->pte);
>
> return kvm_riscv_gstage_set_pte(gstage, pcache, out_map);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this leak physical page tables when
overwriting a lower-level page table directory with a huge page leaf PTE?
If 4KB leaf PTEs inside a THP-backed region are zapped (for example, via
MADV_DONTNEED) but the page directory remains, a subsequent fault triggers
a THP mapping. kvm_riscv_gstage_get_leaf() fails to find a leaf.
The code then falls through here to kvm_riscv_gstage_set_pte(), which blindly
overwrites the existing directory entry with a huge page leaf PTE. Because
freeing page tables is not yet supported, the orphaned child page tables
appear to be leaked.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
> index 8a0aa5e0e216e..c71c1ebb07857 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
[ ... ]
> + for (;;) {
> + if (signal_pending(current))
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD, vcpu))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + cond_resched();
> + ret = kvm_riscv_mmu_map(vcpu, memslot, range->gpa, hva, false, &out_map);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (pte_val(out_map.pte))
> + break;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Can this loop spin infinitely if the userspace thread blocks SIGBUS and
KVM encounters a hardware-poisoned page?
Looking at kvm_riscv_mmu_map(), it handles HWPOISON by calling
send_sig_mceerr() and returning 0 without populating out_map.
If the userspace thread has SIGBUS blocked, send_sig_mceerr() queues the
signal but might not set TIF_SIGPENDING. In that scenario, signal_pending()
won't catch the pending signal, out_map.pte remains empty, and the loop
will retry infinitely without yielding back to userspace.
> +
> + map_size = PAGE_SIZE << (out_map.level * kvm_riscv_gstage_index_bits);
> + end = ALIGN_DOWN(range->gpa, map_size) + map_size;
> +
> + return min_t(u64, range->size, end - range->gpa);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Does this miscalculate the mapped progress when handling a split THP page?
If transparent_hugepage_adjust() aligns the gpa down to the 2MB base and
kvm_riscv_gstage_map_page() falls back to a 4KB mapping, the 4KB PTE is
populated at the base address. out_map.addr is correctly set to this base.
However, the progress here is calculated using the original unaligned
range->gpa instead of out_map.addr. If the requested GPA was at an offset,
KVM might falsely report progress for the unmapped requested page while
actually mapping the unrequested base page.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814114507.583424-1-jinyu.tang@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 11:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: riscv: Add KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY support Jinyu Tang
2026-08-14 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: riscv: Implement KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY Jinyu Tang
2026-08-14 12:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: selftests: Add RISC-V Sv57 page table indexing Jinyu Tang
2026-08-14 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: selftests: Enable pre_fault_memory_test for RISC-V Jinyu Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814120445.3324C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jinyu.tang@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox