From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault()
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:04:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814150428.E2FCC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814144041.169025-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Accessing `sg->parent` outside of `children_lock` leads to a TOCTOU NULL pointer dereference if the shadow gmap is concurrently unshadowed.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v1 2/6] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() ---
commit 64108760233a08b4a69c94be48f33b269ea23a85
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault()
This commit addresses an issue where nested guest memory is not present in
the parent guest gmap, causing dat_entry_walk() to return -ENOENT. It fixes
this by manually calling gmap_link() on the nested guest's memory if the
mapping is absent.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> index 36102b2727fbf..0d5d46d4c66fd 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> @@ -1593,12 +1593,25 @@ static inline int ___gaccess_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg
> parent = READ_ONCE(sg->parent);
> if (!parent)
> return -EAGAIN;
> +retry:
> scoped_guard(spinlock, &parent->children_lock) {
> if (READ_ONCE(sg->parent) != parent)
> return -EAGAIN;
> sg->invalidated = false;
> rc = _gaccess_do_shadow(vcpu->arch.mc, sg, saddr, walk);
> }
> + if (rc == -ENOENT) {
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> + struct guest_fault *entries;
> +
> + entries = get_entries(walk);
> + slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, entries[LEVEL_MEM].gfn);
> + if (!slot)
> + return PGM_ADDRESSING;
> + rc = gmap_link(vcpu->arch.mc, sg->parent, entries + LEVEL_MEM, slot);
[Severity: Critical]
Could accessing sg->parent here lead to a NULL pointer dereference?
The scoped_guard block drops parent->children_lock before this code is
reached. If another vCPU concurrently unshadows sg, sg->parent could be
set to NULL. Because this passes sg->parent directly instead of using the
cached parent variable, does this risk passing NULL into gmap_link() and
causing a host kernel panic?
> + if (!rc)
> + goto retry;
> + }
> if (!rc)
> kvm_s390_release_faultin_array(vcpu->kvm, walk->raw_entries, false);
> return rc;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814144041.169025-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 14:40 [PATCH v1 0/6] KVM: s390: Even more misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 15:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] KVM: s390: Refactor dat_set_slot() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 14:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] KVM: s390: Move all code into kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] KVM: s390: Add missing srcu in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] KVM: s390: Fix potential race in dat_cond_set_storage_key() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814150428.E2FCC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox