Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: s390: Fix potential races in dat skey functions
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:46:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814164625.242221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814163355.227191-7-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The functions `dat_get_storage_key` and `dat_reset_reference_bit` loop infinitely when the requested guest address is unmapped, leading to a host lockup (Denial of Service).

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing TOCTOU fix for concurrent large page split in `_destroy_pages_crste()` allows KVM to use out-of-bounds physical addresses, leading to host memory corruption or panic.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: s390: Fix potential races in dat skey functions ---
commit 7ad4916f2fab0f5e4f1cfe048d34867e81b79c1b
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: s390: Fix potential races in dat skey functions

This commit addresses a race window between dat_entry_walk() and
large_crste_to_phys() where a large page could be split concurrently.
It fixes this by using READ_ONCE on the crste pointer and retrying the
walk if a race is detected.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c b/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> index 7e5dd5a1eb1ef..b4c318ebd91e9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/dat.c
> @@ -620,17 +620,20 @@ int dat_get_storage_key(union asce asce, gfn_t gfn, union skey *skey)
>  	union pte *ptep;
>  	int rc;
>  
> +again:
>  	skey->skey = 0;
>  	rc = dat_entry_walk(NULL, gfn, asce, DAT_WALK_ANY, TABLE_TYPE_PAGE_TABLE, &crstep, &ptep);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
>  	if (!ptep) {
> -		union crste crste;
> +		union crste crste = READ_ONCE(*crstep);
>  
> -		crste = READ_ONCE(*crstep);
> -		if (!crste.h.fc || !crste.s.fc1.pr)
> +		if (!crste_leaf(crste))
> +			goto again;

[Severity: High]
If the guest address is unmapped, dat_entry_walk() with DAT_WALK_ANY can
return 0 with ptep == NULL and an unmapped directory entry (where crste.h.fc
is 0).

Since crste_leaf() returns false when fc is 0, won't this unconditionally
trigger the goto again path and create an infinite loop?

> +		if (!crste.s.fc1.pr)
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		skey->skey = page_get_storage_key(large_crste_to_phys(crste, gfn));

[ ... ]

> @@ -775,9 +792,12 @@ int dat_reset_reference_bit(union asce asce, gfn_t gfn, union skey *skey)
>  	if (!ptep) {
>  		union crste crste = READ_ONCE(*crstep);
>  
> -		if (!crste.h.fc || !crste.s.fc1.pr)
> +		/* A large page has been split concurrently, try again */
> +		if (!crste_leaf(crste))
> +			goto again;

[Severity: High]
Does this also suffer from the same infinite loop issue as
dat_get_storage_key() when processing an unmapped physical address?

> +		if (!crste.s.fc1.pr)
>  			return 0;
> -		skey->skey = page_reset_referenced(large_crste_to_phys(*crstep, gfn)) << 1;
> +		skey->skey = page_reset_referenced(large_crste_to_phys(crste, gfn)) << 1;
>  		return 0;
>  	}

[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing the TOCTOU
fixes here, I noticed a similar pre-existing issue in
arch/s390/kvm/gmap.c:_destroy_pages_crste():

	if (!crstep->h.fc || !crstep->s.fc1.pr)
		return 0;

	origin = crste_origin_large(*crstep);

The crstep pointer is dereferenced twice without READ_ONCE(). If a concurrent
large page split occurs between these reads, crste_origin_large() could return
-1, passing an out-of-bounds address to phys_to_page() and
__kvm_s390_pv_destroy_page().

Should this also be updated with READ_ONCE() to prevent potential host memory
corruption?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814163355.227191-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=6

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 16:33 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: s390: Even more misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: s390: Refactor dat_set_slot() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: s390: Move all code into kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: s390: Add missing srcu in kvm_s390_set_irq_state() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: s390: Fix potential races in dat skey functions Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-14 16:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814164625.242221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox