From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdifatah Suruur" <suruurism@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:53:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819085318.740D81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819083940.1374-1-suruurism@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The patch addresses CVE-2026-68445 for vfio/platform by preventing read-only mappings from being upgraded to writable, but identically vulnerable code remains in vfio/cdx and vfio/fsl-mc.
- [High] Concurrent calls to vfio_platform_read_mmio() or vfio_platform_write_mmio() on an unmapped region can leak ioremap allocations due to unprotected lazy initialization.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable ---
commit 229b89b6deb9e0fe81d355a6a2b3effcd15a2dd9
Author: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>
vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable
This commit prevents userspace from using mprotect() to upgrade read-only
VFIO platform region mappings to writable. It achieves this by clearing the
VM_MAYWRITE flag for regions that lack the VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE flag.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index c72db5a99ebda..20d87c244ca28 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -595,6 +595,10 @@ int vfio_platform_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
> && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Prevent read-only region mappings from being upgraded with mprotect() */
> + if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE))
> + vm_flags_clear(vma, VM_MAYWRITE);
> +
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this same missing check exist in other
VFIO drivers? Looking at vfio_cdx_mmap() in drivers/vfio/cdx/main.c:
if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE) &&
(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
return -EPERM;
return vfio_cdx_mmap_mmio(vdev->regions[index], vma);
And similarly in vfio_fsl_mc_mmap() in drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:
if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE)
&& (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
return -EINVAL;
vma->vm_private_data = mc_dev;
Are these mappings also susceptible to being upgraded to writable using
mprotect() because VM_MAYWRITE is not cleared?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing
vfio_platform_common.c, could concurrent accesses leak ioremap allocations?
In vfio_platform_read_mmio() and vfio_platform_write_mmio():
if (!reg->ioaddr) {
reg->ioaddr =
ioremap(reg->addr, reg->size);
if (!reg->ioaddr)
return -ENOMEM;
}
If two threads concurrently execute pread() or pwrite() on the same unmapped
region, could both observe !reg->ioaddr as true and independently call
ioremap(), resulting in the slower thread overwriting reg->ioaddr and
leaking the mapped memory?
> vma->vm_private_data = vdev;
>
> if (vdev->regions[index].type & VFIO_PLATFORM_REGION_TYPE_MMIO)
> return vfio_platform_mmap_mmio(vdev->regions[index], vma);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819083940.1374-1-suruurism@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 8:39 [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable Abdifatah Suruur
2026-08-19 8:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-19 8:41 Abdifatah Suruur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819085318.740D81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=suruurism@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).