Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:13:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819191317.2C7961F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819190408.247843-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incorrect bitmask computation for floating I/O interrupts causes thundering herd performance regressions or lost wakeups.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior ---
commit 8a0b82ce7a926dc2db73a2448ac2bcc105213707
Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior

This commit improves floating IRQ injection by checking if a VCPU has pending
IRQs instead of blindly waking up the last VCPU that went to sleep. This aims
to prevent deadlocks when a VCPU is sleeping without an open mask.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 8f24bcd1a6d36..3af060ec5be8e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1915,49 +1915,93 @@ static int __inject_io(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static u64 inti_to_irq_pend_mask(u64 type, int isc)
> +{
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case KVM_S390_MCHK:
> +		/* Only repressible machine checks are floating */
> +		return BIT(IRQ_PEND_MCHK_REP);
> +	case KVM_S390_INT_VIRTIO:
> +		return BIT(IRQ_PEND_VIRTIO);
> +	case KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE:
> +		return BIT(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE) |
> +		       BIT(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV);
> +	case KVM_S390_INT_PFAULT_DONE:
> +		return BIT(IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_DONE);
> +	case KVM_S390_INT_IO_MIN...KVM_S390_INT_IO_MAX:
> +		return isc_to_irq_type(isc);

[Severity: High]
Does this correctly return a bitmask? The other cases return BIT() masks, but
this returns a raw integer resulting from isc_to_irq_type().

Could this cause `deliverable_irqs(dst_vcpu) & irq_pend_mask` to check the
wrong bits or evaluate to 0 later in __floating_irq_kick(), leading to skipped
eligible VCPUs and a thundering herd where all VCPUs are woken up?

[ ... ]
> @@ -1974,6 +2018,8 @@ static int __inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti)
>  		rc = __inject_pfault_done(kvm, inti);
>  		break;
>  	case KVM_S390_INT_IO_MIN...KVM_S390_INT_IO_MAX:
> +		/* Grab isc here since __inject_io() might free inti */
> +		isc = isc_to_irq_type(int_word_to_isc(inti->io.io_int_word));

[Severity: High]
Are we applying isc_to_irq_type() twice for I/O interrupts?

This converts the ISC to an IRQ bit index before assigning it to `isc`. Later,
__floating_irq_kick() passes it to inti_to_irq_pend_mask(), which calls
isc_to_irq_type() a second time on the same value.

Since isc_to_irq_type() is implemented as `IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_0 - isc`, calling it
twice will reverse the calculation and yield the original ISC value instead
of the expected IRQ bit index.

>  		rc = __inject_io(kvm, inti);
>  		break;
>  	default:

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819190408.247843-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19 18:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:13   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: s390: Kick PV cpus at the right time for service irqs Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: s390: Add opportunistic floating IRQ injection Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:11   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260819191317.2C7961F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox