Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect noncoherent DMA zaps with SRCU
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 03:02:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260822190224.3788887-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> (raw)

Protect the noncoherent DMA zap with KVM's SRCU so that memslots and
their architecture-specific metadata remain alive if the rmap walk
drops mmu_lock to reschedule.

The VFIO noncoherent-DMA path invokes
kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma() without holding slots_lock or an
SRCU read lock. kvm_zap_gfn_range() can then enter
__walk_slot_rmaps(), which retains pointers to a memslot and its rmap
while cond_resched_rwlock_write() temporarily drops mmu_lock.

The race looks like this:

  CPU 0: VFIO coherency update          CPU 1: memslot delete
  ----------------------------          ---------------------
  kvm_vfio_set_attr()
    kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma()
      kvm_zap_gfn_range()
        __walk_slot_rmaps()
          iterator.rmap = slot->arch.rmap
          cond_resched_rwlock_write()
            drop mmu_lock

                                        KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION(DELETE)
                                          kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot()
                                            zap SPTEs under mmu_lock
                                          kvm_swap_active_memslots()
                                            synchronize_srcu_expedited()
                                          kvm_free_memslot()
                                            vfree(slot->arch.rmap[i])
                                            kfree(slot)

          reacquire mmu_lock
          slot_rmap_walk_next()
            read freed iterator.rmap

The delete path is allowed to free the old memslot because the zap path
holds no SRCU read lock. synchronize_srcu_expedited() therefore does not
wait for the rmap walk before kvm_free_memslot() releases the old slot
and its rmap array. When the zap resumes, slot_rmap_walk_next() reads
from freed memory.

KASAN reported:

  BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in
  slot_rmap_walk_next+0x82/0x1c0
  Read of size 8 at addr ffffc900005c1008

  Call Trace:
   slot_rmap_walk_next+0x82/0x1c0
   __kvm_rmap_zap_gfn_range+0x17a/0x280
   kvm_zap_gfn_range+0x2a6/0x6a0
   kvm_vfio_set_attr+0x576/0x770
   kvm_device_ioctl+0x1ff/0x3b0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x1c0

Hold SRCU across the zap so that memslot deletion waits for the walk to
finish before freeing the old slot, without changing zap behavior.

Fixes: 362ff6dca541 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Zap KVM TDP when noncoherent DMA assignment starts/stops")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 69469bbdc84a..2114553f3159 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -14092,8 +14092,12 @@ static void kvm_noncoherent_dma_assignment_start_or_stop(struct kvm *kvm)
 	 *
 	 * If KVM always honors guest PAT, however, there is nothing to do.
 	 */
-	if (kvm_check_has_quirk(kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_IGNORE_GUEST_PAT))
+	if (kvm_check_has_quirk(kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_IGNORE_GUEST_PAT)) {
+		int idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
 		kvm_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(0), gpa_to_gfn(~0ULL));
+		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+	}
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma(struct kvm *kvm)
-- 
2.43.0

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-08-22 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260822190224.3788887-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --to=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox