From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
bobbyeshleman@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
bryan-bt.tan@broadcom.com, vishnu.dasa@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v4 0/2] vsock: validate packet sources after bound lookup fallback
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:39:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826003929.966160-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
Both virtio and VMCI look up connected sockets by the full tuple before
falling back to a destination-only bound lookup. The fallback can select a
non-listening socket without validating the packet source.
V2 covered only the virtio path. Following Stefano's review, this series
moves the source and transport validation into a documented AF_VSOCK helper
and uses it for both virtio and VMCI. The VMCI patch checks both its
bottom-half and deferred workqueue receive paths.
V4 preserves VMCI's existing RST behavior when source validation fails.
The reset is addressed from the received packet so that a bound but
non-listening or concurrently closed socket still notifies the sender,
without directing the reset to a connected socket's stored peer.
The v3 regression was reproduced in three x86_64 KASAN boots: a REQUEST to
a bound but non-listening socket returned VMCI_ERROR_NO_ACCESS but no RST
arrived within one second. With v4, the sending context received the
expected RST in all three boots. The original VMCI source-validation oracle
also passed in three v4 boots: a matched RST reset the pending socket while
a mismatched-context RST left it pending. No KASAN report occurred.
Patch 1 is unchanged from v3 (identical stable patch-id) and carries
Bobby's Reviewed-by for that revision. Its v3 validation covered the
cross-UID injection oracle, local CID aliases, selected VSOCK selftests,
and W=1 changed-object builds under allmodconfig and allyesconfig.
The current-tree guest-CID vhost probe could not be rerun because the test
user lacks access to /dev/vhost-vsock.
---
Changes in v4:
- Preserve RST replies when VMCI source validation rejects a packet.
- Address those replies from the received packet rather than the socket's
stored peer.
- Add a bound-but-not-listening VMCI regression oracle.
- Rebase to the current net tree.
Changes in v3:
- Move transport and source validation into vsock_check_source().
- Trust the internally generated source CID for the local transport.
- Add VMCI validation in the bottom-half and workqueue receive paths.
- Send the related virtio and VMCI fixes in one series.
- Do not carry Bobby's v2 Reviewed-by because the helper and loopback logic
changed; renewed review is requested.
v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260823175858.351431-1-4ncienth@gmail.com
v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260820001517.2148196-1-4ncienth@gmail.com
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260813121236.2328599-1-4ncienth@gmail.com
Daehyeon Ko (2):
vsock/virtio: validate packet source for connected sockets
vsock/vmci: validate packet source for connected sockets
include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 3 ++-
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
base-commit: dc4b95b8fee95113587e93ca116356032d271371
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 0:39 Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-08-26 0:39 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] vsock/virtio: validate packet source for connected sockets Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-26 0:39 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] vsock/vmci: " Daehyeon Ko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826003929.966160-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
--to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bryan-bt.tan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishnu.dasa@broadcom.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox