Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: x86/xen: Convert evtchn_ports from IDR to XArray
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 23:36:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831233621.136B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831213632.81023-14-dwmw2@infradead.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Type confusion in evtchnfd delivery union allows a userspace guest to crash the host kernel by assigning an EVTCHNSTAT_ipi event channel to port 0.
--

commit 365d4c87b9f4941190fe8a9a101dce7853ba1e18
Author: Furkan Caliskan <frn1furkan10@gmail.com>

KVM: x86/xen: Convert evtchn_ports from IDR to XArray
    
This patch converts the deprecated IDR used for evtchn_ports into an XArray.
It replaces idr_alloc() with xa_insert() and idr_remove() with xa_erase(),
dropping the explicit rcu_read_lock() in kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send() since
xa_load() is internally RCU-safe.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> index b024a09de55a3..b59c6b747c2f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> @@ -2214,13 +2214,13 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
> -	ret = idr_alloc(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, evtchnfd, port, port + 1,
> +	ret = xa_insert(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port, evtchnfd,
>  			GFP_KERNEL);

[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this union type
confusion allow a userspace guest to crash the host kernel?

When a userspace process calls the KVM ioctl to assign an event channel with
type EVTCHNSTAT_ipi and send_port = 0, the setup code just prior to this
insertion does the following in kvm_xen_eventfd_assign():

	evtchnfd->deliver.port.port = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.port;
	evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_id = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.vcpu;
	evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_idx = -1;

Because of the union layout in the evtchnfd structure, deliver.port overlaps
with deliver.eventfd. Writing -1 to vcpu_idx corrupts the eventfd_ctx pointer.

> [ ... ]
> @@ -2235,7 +2235,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, u32 port)
>  	struct evtchnfd *evtchnfd;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
> -	evtchnfd = idr_remove(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port);
> +	evtchnfd = xa_erase(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port);
>  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock);
>  
>  	if (!evtchnfd)
> @@ -2251,7 +2251,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, u32 port)
> [ ... ]
> @@ -2376,23 +2374,23 @@ void kvm_xen_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  void kvm_xen_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct evtchnfd *evtchnfd;
> -	int i;
> +	unsigned long i;
>  
>  	kvm_gpc_deactivate(&kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache);
>  
> -	idr_for_each_entry(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, evtchnfd, i) {
> +	xa_for_each(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, i, evtchnfd) {
>  		if (!evtchnfd->deliver.port.port)
>  			eventfd_ctx_put(evtchnfd->deliver.eventfd.ctx);

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this check trigger an invalid pointer
dereference due to the type confusion mentioned above?

If an IPI was assigned to port 0, evtchnfd->deliver.port.port evaluates to 0,
making the condition true. The kernel will then mistakenly dereference the
corrupted pointer (overlapping with vcpu_idx = -1) by calling
eventfd_ctx_put().

This exact sequence is present during deassignment in
kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(), as well as here during VM destruction, which
seems like it could lead to a kernel panic and a host denial of service.

>  		kfree(evtchnfd);
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831213632.81023-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 21:26 [PATCH v3 0/13] KVM: x86/xen: Bug fixes and long_mode cleanup David Woodhouse
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] KVM: x86/xen: Rename 'longmode' to 'is_64bit' in hypercall handling David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:18   ` Paul Durrant
2026-09-02 18:24     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 18:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-02 22:00         ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: x86/xen: Introduce kvm_xen_has_64bit_shinfo() macro David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:21   ` Paul Durrant
2026-09-02 18:28     ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] KVM: x86/xen: Rename max_evtchn_port() to kvm_max_evtchn_port() David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:22   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] KVM: x86/xen: Latch shinfo mode in kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast() David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:25   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] KVM: x86/xen: Latch shinfo mode in kvm_xen_schedop_poll() David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:27   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] KVM: x86/xen: Enforce 4-byte alignment of vcpu_info registration David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:29   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] KVM: x86/xen: Use 32-bit locked bts for vcpu_info evtchn_pending_sel David Woodhouse
2026-08-31 22:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 23:18     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:33   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: x86/xen: Use 32-bit atomics if vCPU's evtchn_pending_sel isn't aligned David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:38   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] KVM: x86/xen: Use atomic*() APIs instead of open coded equivalents David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:41   ` Paul Durrant
2026-09-02 18:32     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 18:59       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: x86/xen: Take kvm->srcu in __kvm_xen_has_interrupt() David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:43   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: x86/xen: Mark poll_evtchn accesses with READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:45   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: pfncache: use a dedicated invalidation sequence for cache refresh David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:14   ` Paul Durrant
2026-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: x86/xen: Convert evtchn_ports from IDR to XArray David Woodhouse
2026-08-31 23:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01  0:07     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-02 12:48   ` Paul Durrant
2026-09-04 15:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/13] KVM: x86/xen: Bug fixes and long_mode cleanup Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831233621.136B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox