Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Shameer Kolothum" <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/19] vfio/pci: Coordinate generic device access with host recovery
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901095621.30FC91F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901093217.8539-19-skolothumtho@nvidia.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Writing a reserved bit (INTX_DISABLE) to the PCI Command register on pre-PCI 2.3 devices during AER resume.
--

commit 61aa3eda44efb78a0975edb523d9adc67f239efa
Author: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>

vfio/pci: Coordinate generic device access with host recovery

This commit wires up error_detected() for generic vfio-pci devices that
have opted into host recovery. It safely coordinates with the host by
blocking device access, draining running requests, revoking mappings,
and stopping bus mastering.

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index eed0430c32ee6..2d757d6a5fe1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2746,14 +2746,178 @@ pci_ers_result_t vfio_pci_core_aer_err_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  {
>  	struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>  	struct vfio_pci_eventfd *eventfd;

[ ... ]

> +	ret = pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND,
> +				    vdev->pci_recovery_command &
> +				    ~PCI_COMMAND_MASTER);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_failed;
> +
> +	vdev->pci_recovery_command_valid = true;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this correctly handle pre-PCI 2.3 devices during AER resume?

Here vdev->pci_recovery_command_valid is set to true for devices even when
the device lacks PCI 2.3 support. Later, during resume, if this flag is true,
it appears vfio_pci_intx_recovery_command() in drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
is invoked and applies the INTX_DISABLE bit unconditionally if the logical
context is masked:

drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c:vfio_pci_intx_recovery_command() {
    ...
    if (ctx && ctx->masked)
        command |= PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE;
    ...
}

Since pre-PCI 2.3 devices do not support INTX_DISABLE, could this write a
reserved bit to the PCI Command register on legacy hardware and cause
undefined behavior?

> +	goto out_memory;
> +
> +out_failed:
> +	WRITE_ONCE(vdev->pci_recovery_flags,
> +		   (vdev->pci_recovery_flags | VFIO_PCI_RECOVERY_FAILED) &
> +		   ~VFIO_PCI_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS);

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901093217.8539-1-skolothumtho@nvidia.com?part=18

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  9:31 [RFC PATCH 00/19] vfio/pci: Handle PCI error recovery and report state to userspace Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] vfio/pci: Add PCI error recovery support state Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] vfio/pci: Serialize generic device lifetime with recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 13:14   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-09-01 13:37     ` Shameer Kolothum Thodi
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] vfio/pci: Add PCI recovery access guards Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] vfio/pci: Serialize function reset with recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:06   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-09-03 11:20     ` Shameer Kolothum Thodi
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] vfio/pci: Serialize config access " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:27   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-09-03 11:08     ` Shameer Kolothum Thodi
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] vfio/pci: Serialize ioeventfd writes " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] vfio/pci: Retry BAR faults after temporary recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] vfio/pci: Serialize BAR and ROM access with recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] vfio/pci: Serialize interrupt operations " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  6:34   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-09-03 10:39     ` Shameer Kolothum Thodi
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] vfio/pci: Serialize hot reset " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] vfio/pci: Serialize runtime PM " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  6:43   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-09-03 10:47     ` Shameer Kolothum Thodi
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] vfio/pci: Serialize physical device information queries " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] vfio/pci: Serialize DMA-BUF export " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] vfio/pci: Add generic PCI error slot reset handling Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] vfio/pci: Add INTx helpers for PCI recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] vfio/pci: Quiesce INTx during " Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] vfio/pci: Add generic PCI error resume handling Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] vfio/pci: Coordinate generic device access with host recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] vfio/pci: Expose and enable host PCI error recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-09-01  9:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH 00/19] vfio/pci: Handle PCI error recovery and report state to userspace Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901095621.30FC91F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox