From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: YuanShang <YuanShang.Mao@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/pci: Block for the upstream bridge lock in vfio_pci_core_disable()
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:29:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908082942.B1CAF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908080946.2235849-1-YuanShang.Mao@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Replacing pci_dev_trylock(bridge) with a blocking pci_dev_lock(bridge) introduces a 3-thread AB-BA-CA deadlock.
--
commit 170de39cb1fd30df6e523a31c390c9881837b836
Author: YuanShang <YuanShang.Mao@amd.com>
vfio/pci: Block for the upstream bridge lock in vfio_pci_core_disable()
This commit changes vfio_pci_core_disable() to take the upstream bridge lock
blocking instead of with a trylock. This is intended to serialize concurrent
resets of virtual functions under the same bridge.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index 6757054e9d875..01f0238057c76 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -791,8 +791,8 @@ void vfio_pci_core_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> */
> if (vdev->reset_works) {
> bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> - if (bridge && !pci_dev_trylock(bridge))
> - goto out_restore_state;
> + if (bridge)
> + pci_dev_lock(bridge);
[Severity: High]
Does this blocking lock create a deadlock cycle with PCI device removal and
bus reset operations?
Replacing pci_dev_trylock(bridge) with a blocking pci_dev_lock(bridge)
introduces a 3-thread AB-BA-CA deadlock. This can freeze the involved threads
and lock the PCI bus subsystem, leading to a hung task and an unusable system.
Could this sequence occur?
Thread 1 (driver unbind): Triggers driver removal. device_release_driver()
acquires device_lock(&pdev->dev) and calls vfio_unregister_group_dev(),
which blocks waiting for the device's open file descriptors to be closed
(waiting for device->comp completion).
Thread 2 (PCI bus reset): A concurrent bus reset calls pci_bus_lock(),
which acquires pci_dev_lock(bridge) and then iterates children to acquire
pci_dev_lock(pdev) (which uses device_lock(&pdev->dev)). It blocks waiting
for Thread 1.
Thread 3 (userspace close): Userspace closes the VFIO device FD. In
vfio_device_fops_release(), the driver calls vfio_pci_core_disable(), which
now blocks on pci_dev_lock(bridge) waiting for Thread 2.
Because Thread 3 is blocked, it never reaches vfio_device_put_registration()
to signal device->comp, causing Thread 1 to wait forever.
This race condition seems triggerable when an unprivileged user closes an
open VFIO FD concurrently with a root-initiated driver unbind and/or PCI
bus reset.
> if (pci_dev_trylock(pdev)) {
> if (!__pci_reset_function_locked(pdev))
> vdev->needs_reset = false;
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908080946.2235849-1-YuanShang.Mao@amd.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 8:09 [RFC PATCH] vfio/pci: Block for the upstream bridge lock in vfio_pci_core_disable() YuanShang
2026-09-08 8:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908082942.B1CAF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=YuanShang.Mao@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox