From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612E73C3442 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789719354; cv=none; b=kFk5lrNf/OW6Fl5/pzlZdmRq1ht8SaLkeIN/IXetBiDJG+QZyhuVgIPXDdTPOs0i2djE+z+w3RfTUEG2TEEivzLq5sNXbL+LRvciQast7oqs2mMVnP2OAPFjLS1URE7Uxgythw+FDTKRZWWnIdeSgFd+/hUdJ06pdfygPwLojBg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789719354; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LecEQKu/SDwbIJ98w082y35hYPM4bZ2YqckHZDStxmM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nf/oa1B9uDYNzbmHXkB5eY8JSIxwtwsGHWky+5wTJJzh53JKRYU9BCa1BZ/M+qMOtNnFABJIB/vZS6Z1fUQfdLkRNPQdPy/4G0no+v1oK6EOMko1s1cT6+XIV1CJX8D5q0dY6ytAuMjZEDJB0ucm5h0B5WhWSMfB1hAnvLGQG20= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=fkp7rGHf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fkp7rGHf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1789719351; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p+RBgkHWDBWjcz9ZqG24LQx/Q7KFkaJuhhsDYniJ5qc=; b=fkp7rGHf9s/dxvG5DcDVQL35OCYMfDAeJZIe5uTv+u8X1LB6PEqUOvjuPMnSoHpkYvUAMi 7fkUOFRDsEce9AcxW2RWQzVLNua0mT54EWO4HrJsYzE/e8JqUoQRv+mqQwoOUM67gwR09x rGr3sRljIoebzWhM+XHtt8SoS0HSnY8= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-111-3aSHCHnJPLag7WyhqsRq-A-1; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:15:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3aSHCHnJPLag7WyhqsRq-A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 3aSHCHnJPLag7WyhqsRq-A_1789719345 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD3A194511A; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virtlab1023.virt.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com (virtlab1023.virt.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com [10.18.48.26]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A607F1800348; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:15:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Bonzini To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: nsaenz@amazon.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, snambakam@linux.microsoft.com Subject: [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:15:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20260918081543.139871-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20260918081543.139871-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <20260918081543.139871-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Update x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test to take into account memory fault flags might contain multiple bits set while remaining valid---for example KVM might return KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_READ in addition to KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c index e6d16e9d6120..33fd73465432 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static void test_private_access_memslot_deleted(void) exit_reason = (u32)(u64)thread_return; TEST_ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT); - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE); + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags & KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE, + "Memory fault didn't occur on a private memory access"); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE); @@ -103,7 +104,8 @@ static void test_private_access_memslot_not_private(void) exit_reason = run_vcpu_get_exit_reason(vcpu); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT); - TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags, KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE); + TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->memory_fault.flags & KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE, + "Memory fault didn't occur on a private memory access"); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.gpa, EXITS_TEST_GPA); TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->memory_fault.size, EXITS_TEST_SIZE); -- 2.52.0