From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6F65505F6; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790084628; cv=none; b=WG8f/t64LXJROX0k3wjVeql8AmgAVeter1uUpuwGhDzmh+rw0bu38cXiKR8KwpHPw+Qee8IefM2CJb0iiwORtJjqPaQf2JGB1keag6Y/Z5GTWbNbTze2DLxbgI/9iXdWuuix8QL1icITRYdvxFWZK/1J2HSvCs+HwheDP7F4cz0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790084628; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ovVnefA02WkoJ658KVzJ3jVZ7Mbf7IPhNzlKxgzPjd4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=GicnIF13nDBHXud+LUyPdmnSRiFDODn7C6yGERezFcb44kJ0PPSPs/Rql0W5MV2uH8IDfeLpdELMkH/cbz64Rq/KmgaifEeH75ffD50qL9TWxMgJfwxftl7eLZ/vzLQfTb79R4gqB/SjMwA36TL711fj3uffZAcGmCC1nWt0KOY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jFkoYbWj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jFkoYbWj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50ECA1F00893; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:43:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790084626; bh=ovVnefA02WkoJ658KVzJ3jVZ7Mbf7IPhNzlKxgzPjd4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=jFkoYbWjY9F1rni2wRbuelGiUAvksSZ+XvCXsPftsoZ/JglQTstaoKfGhNCEEKqCM QHK1I80nJw0EvIMblJjchJWj4P53dG9iJ1/m44NYRBqYsKesXpEJKJcIvTF/0zBXXj 63QBamNHA0F74gSsQC4fgqUwwjIv/A7eqGykDgajdjSpRfSwiv/9TBy65aUx5mv81o CIgF71pFXkLLBt4G7civNxa4VjFptIM5phXAMdu0NmXdk5CZtL6Rv6A6eEMXC3pg3Q dNsIFmrh6YI4XE5ABNQJyKmXSAtCcyHHc99BOyuKEZg/sLqqgK27oxAfi1/Yad1j/j mT9NacuQgb62g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 8/8] vsock: enforce no-transport invariant for TCP_LISTEN sockets Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Michal Luczaj" Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Eugenio Perez" , kvm@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260922-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v3-8-78907b8200d4@rbox.co> References: <20260922-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v3-0-78907b8200d4@rbox.co> <20260922-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v3-8-78907b8200d4@rbox.co> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:43:46 +0000 Message-Id: <20260922134346.50ECA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > In the past, listener socket could carry an assigned transport (uselessly, > but harmlessly, except for unnecessarily hogging the kernel module refcnt= ). > That's not the case anymore. Express/enforce the invariant. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922-vsock-conn= ect-reset-closing-v3-0-78907b8200d4@rbox.co?part=3D8