From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE82F8635D; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790126321; cv=none; b=cM7EpNzCIZE9EIcuWWRUOXpgzjffR/HbbB0vl9oLGBq0jczuoD78R676jkhZ+mBxiHVVeSdpFBH6zpsiTTvVfqvXkAGoBpqcfd2lfXEfo32PIWoU1/tS6Z97klwfyinZbgOaT0IAvZNPw3IPOnGzDBQl2WOxnz6T1Guoent/3mY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790126321; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JkfNOugQqpUgSLTyR/cXfk7+S1E1KMJ9mf8/T8MOHEk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=ESs3h46O2bx6rV5hY/sWYrKbZzuV6qsJN3fnyKZS4+PKdazxKtkmshe4zURFPzNGttlKtBiAuUpvv8X5ARzWkZ5KXB9EIbl1qchHo6dzTzTQCNxaLpqe834oZr6cuIAgb/Tn/eNOFovgFgxXw4o8EfynnMb76lA0+CVR89FQWgo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Y6FamZUG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y6FamZUG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F8A81F000FF; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:18:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790126320; bh=JkfNOugQqpUgSLTyR/cXfk7+S1E1KMJ9mf8/T8MOHEk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Y6FamZUGXQPv5AKE6JVKqK85hOpgXFsxMKS2lxT0wqzDZdyokf7lmnYVjR9VDI3Js G39sg08Yq7ouemw3xRPVyixV/CAojXZNsR5iK6EZX92ShA5ihWrEgI3gJCUJw1pvhC j3R9hpXqo9DKAc2jXb8QAAQHVtZkiO20+x33GiDsBatH8L841jXikYUhJB2yYomqwM r3dEfVsX6j61fIGaQxH/pNqw02CHvjzUtbS59t5ikHmNufK3AojanrO/7esS/ftxIl VnkaZyz+DUCYmtJipEYEUjNCnHkPfoNMxVYYaDCdCFmmtFYGhInAY5sK8IwCEvD5Wj 5DL2zCfbzx4jg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] vsock: constify the transport in vsock_for_each_connected_socket() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Bobby Eshleman" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Eugenio Perez" , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" In-Reply-To: <20260921-vsock-guest-ns-v2-1-693bd78fde9e@meta.com> References: <20260921-vsock-guest-ns-v2-0-693bd78fde9e@meta.com> <20260921-vsock-guest-ns-v2-1-693bd78fde9e@meta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:18:39 +0000 Message-Id: <20260923011840.1F8A81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Bobby Eshleman >=20 > Allow const transports to be passed too. The function only compares the > pointer against vsk->transport, which is itself const, and never writes > through it. >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921-vsock-gues= t-ns-v2-0-693bd78fde9e@meta.com?part=3D1