Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ackerley Tng" <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/17] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of unsupported filesystem for resource_fd
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:56:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926005600.D3C181F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925-gmem-tmpfs-backend-v1-7-d36159822d18@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] kvm: selftests: missing capability check for GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_USE_RESOURCE
--

commit 12edbf910d6d9507b605565dea5dca809a2eece9
Author: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Test rejection of unsupported filesystem for resource_fd

This commit adds test coverage to verify that passing a directory file
descriptor from an unsupported filesystem fails with EOPNOTSUPP.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> index 84b958b9ef715..31bc74c4c26bd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -495,6 +516,7 @@ static void test_guest_memfd(unsigned long vm_type)
>  	test_guest_memfd_flags(vm);
>  
>  	test_resource_fd_invalid(vm);
> +	test_resource_fd_unsupported_fs(vm);

[Severity: Medium]
Does this new test invocation need to verify if the underlying KVM module
supports the GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_USE_RESOURCE capability before running?

The test_guest_memfd() function unconditionally calls
test_resource_fd_unsupported_fs(), which passes the
GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_USE_RESOURCE flag to KVM. On older kernels lacking this
feature, the ioctl will reject the unknown flag with -EINVAL.

Since the test explicitly expects -EOPNOTSUPP, this mismatch will cause the
assertion to fail and abort the test run, unexpectedly breaking backward
compatibility for the test suite.

>  
>  	__test_guest_memfd(vm, 0);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925-gmem-tmpfs-backend-v1-0-d36159822d18@google.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  0:50 [PATCH RFC 00/17] Allow guest_memfd to be created using a resource (pool) fd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 01/17] mm: shmem: Implement guest_memfd provider operations for tmpfs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 13:07   ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-01 14:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-01 15:47       ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-01 17:15         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 02/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Support provider folio allocation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 03/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Support provider folio invalidation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 04/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Add helper to attach resource provider file Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 05/17] KVM: selftests: Add helper to create guest_memfd with a resource file Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 06/17] KVM: selftests: Test negative validation of resource_fd argument Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 07/17] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of unsupported filesystem for resource_fd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 08/17] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of tmpfs file " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 09/17] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of swap tmpfs mounts Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 10/17] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of hugepage " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 11/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd with anonymous fsmount() tmpfs pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:50 ` [PATCH RFC 12/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd with mounted tmpfs root directory Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:51 ` [PATCH RFC 13/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd resource pool sharing across instances Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:51 ` [PATCH RFC 14/17] KVM: selftests: Test memory allocation against shared tmpfs resource pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:51 ` [PATCH RFC 15/17] KVM: selftests: Test that shared tmpfs resource pool size limit is respected Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  0:51 ` [PATCH RFC 16/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest execution with tmpfs-backed guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-26  1:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  0:51 ` [PATCH RFC 17/17] KVM: selftests: Document testing TODOs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-09-28 16:32 ` [PATCH RFC 00/17] Allow guest_memfd to be created using a resource (pool) fd David Woodhouse
2026-09-28 22:59   ` Ackerley Tng
2026-09-29 16:17     ` David Woodhouse
2026-09-29 23:41       ` Ackerley Tng
2026-09-30  0:08         ` David Woodhouse
2026-10-01 13:43 ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260926005600.D3C181F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox