From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:13:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002091347.630461F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001202234.3794060-6-seanjc@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] kvm: x86/mmu: Kernel panic via NULL pointer dereference in gfn_to_rmap() during VM destruction
--
commit 51cc08e54e96c8c842b1348871cdf24648cdd20a
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered
This commit installs dummy, empty memslots immediately after unregistering
KVM's mmu_notifier during VM destruction. It aims to harden against
accessing memory from the wrong address space when tearing down a VM.
> Instally dummy, empty memslots immediately after unregistering KVM's
This isn't a bug, but there is a typo (Instally) here.
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index f368240aa1cdd..770a2c3bd4458 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1302,12 +1321,10 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count = 0;
> else
> WARN_ON(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress);
> + kvm_destroy_memslots(kvm);
> +
> kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
[Severity: Critical]
Does calling kvm_destroy_memslots() before kvm_arch_destroy_vm() risk a NULL
pointer dereference?
If a user creates a VM, maps memory into it (creating leaf SPTEs),
and closes the VM file descriptor without terminating the process
(mm_users remains > 0), mmu_notifier_unregister() is called.
However, it does not invoke the release callback because the process's
mm is still alive.
As a result, kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() is skipped and shadow pages
remain intact.
Next, kvm_destroy_memslots() replaces the active memslots with
kvm_empty_memslots.
Then, kvm_arch_destroy_vm() tears down the vCPUs via
kvm_destroy_vcpus(), calling kvm_mmu_unload(), which recursively zaps
the remaining shadow pages.
When leaf SPTEs are dropped, rmap_remove() looks up the memslot for
the GFN:
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:rmap_remove() {
...
slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
rmap_head = gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
...
}
Since the memslots are now empty, __gfn_to_memslot() returns NULL,
which is then unconditionally dereferenced by gfn_to_rmap():
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:gfn_to_rmap() {
...
idx = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, level);
return &slot->arch.rmap[level - PG_LEVEL_4K][idx];
}
Could this lead to a host kernel panic during VM destruction?
> kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001202234.3794060-1-seanjc@google.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 20:22 [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: Fix+harden against bad uaccess using dying VM Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: Reject user accesses to guest memory if current->mm != kvm->mm Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 21:08 ` James Houghton
2026-10-01 21:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 21:28 ` James Houghton
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: PPC: Flush/zap all memslots on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: x86: Unmap VMAs for KVM-internal memslots when the memslot is freed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 21:26 ` James Houghton
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 13:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: Disallow setting memslots when the VM is being destroyed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered Sean Christopherson
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-02 14:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: WARN if KVM attempts to do guest-related uaccess with "wrong" process Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: WARN and reject guest-based uaccess if VM is dying Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: nVMX: Don't flush shadow VMCS12 to guest memory during vCPU teardown Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: nVMX: Don't try to load eVMCS12 page when the VM is dying Sean Christopherson
2026-10-01 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: Pre-check uaccesses in KVM's APIs to read/write guest memory Sean Christopherson
2026-10-02 9:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 13:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-02 20:30 ` [syzbot ci] Re: KVM: Fix+harden against bad uaccess using dying VM syzbot ci
2026-10-02 20:39 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002091347.630461F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox