From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] vfio/selftests: Add observability test for IO page table usage
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:14:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002091406.993B61F00899@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001224531.765278-8-praan@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] selftests: vfio_nr_pages_test skips IOMMUFD due to zero-initialized fd assumption
- [Medium] selftests: vfio_nr_pages_test crashes when mapping PROT_NONE memory
--
commit d7003d8f6957a90f40b858dea08cd7ccf897ea8b
Author: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
vfio/selftests: Add observability test for IO page table usage
This commit adds a new selftest, vfio_nr_pages_test, to validate the
iommu-nr-pages fdinfo metric across IOMMU backends. The test performs
sparse mappings to force deep page table allocation and checks that the
metric increases and remains allocated upon unmapping.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_nr_pages_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_nr_pages_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..aef6b1dd8e19d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_nr_pages_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
[ ... ]
> +static long read_nr_pages(struct iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + char path[256];
> + char line[128];
> + FILE *f;
> + long val = -1;
> + int fd = iommu->container_fd != -1 ? iommu->container_fd : iommu->iommufd;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this ternary operation erroneously yield 0 instead of the actual
iommufd file descriptor?
In IOMMUFD mode, iommu->container_fd is implicitly initialized to 0 via
calloc_assert() in iommu_init(), while iommu->iommufd is initialized to the
actual file descriptor.
This causes the ternary operator iommu->container_fd != -1 to evaluate to
true, assigning fd = 0.
The test then reads from /proc/self/fdinfo/0, fails to find the metric, and
silently skips execution for the IOMMUFD backend.
[ ... ]
> +TEST_F(vfio_nr_pages_test, sparse_mapping_sticky_reclamation)
> +{
> + long nr_pages_initial, nr_pages_mapped, nr_pages_final;
> + struct dma_region region1 = {0};
> + struct dma_region region2 = {0};
> +
> + if (!self->iommu || !self->device)
> + SKIP(return, "Fixture setup failed");
> +
> + nr_pages_initial = read_nr_pages(self->iommu);
> + if (nr_pages_initial < 0)
> + SKIP(return, "iommu-nr-pages not reported by this IOMMU");
> +
> + /* Map a page at start */
> + region1.size = SZ_4K;
> + region1.vaddr = mmap_reserve(region1.size, region1.size, 0);
> + ASSERT_NE(MAP_FAILED, region1.vaddr);
> + region1.iova = 0x100000;
> + iommu_map(self->iommu, ®ion1);
[Severity: Medium]
Does mapping this PROT_NONE region cause the test to crash?
mmap_reserve() provisions memory using mmap() with strictly PROT_NONE
protections. The test immediately passes this region to iommu_map()
without calling mprotect() or over-mapping with PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE.
The kernel will attempt to pin these pages using get_user_pages(), which
will fail with -EFAULT due to lack of read/write permissions.
The iommu_map() wrapper asserts success, causing the test to unconditionally
crash.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001224531.765278-1-praan@google.com?part=7
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 22:45 [RFC PATCH 0/7] iommu: Introduce Page Table Observability Framework Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] iommu: Add infrastructure for per-domain IOPT accounting Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] iommu: Implement domain-attributed page allocation Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] iommupt: Enable per-domain IOPT attribution Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] vfio/type1: Expose IO page table usage via fdinfo Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] iommufd: " Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] iommufd/selftest: Add observability test for iommu-nr-pages Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] vfio/selftests: Add observability test for IO page table usage Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-10-02 9:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002091406.993B61F00899@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox