Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@amd.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,  mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	 santosh.shukla@amd.com, nikunj.dadhania@amd.com,
	Naveen.Rao@amd.com,  dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com,
	ravi.bangoria@amd.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	 Sandipan.Das@amd.com, Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add a KVM-only leaf for IBS capabilities
Date: Thu,  8 Oct 2026 10:44:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008174424.717033-1-jmattson@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310060022.15120-4-manali.shukla@amd.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 06:00:15AM +0000, Manali Shukla wrote:
> Add a KVM-only leaf for AMD's Instruction Based Sampling capabilities.
> Multiple IBS related capabilities are added to KVM-only leaf, so that KVM
> can set these capabilities for the guest, when IBS feature bit is
> enabled on the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 32dd2d55e6f0..01abdf7f112b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ enum kvm_only_cpuid_leafs {
>  	CPUID_12_EAX	 = NCAPINTS,
>  	CPUID_7_1_EDX,
>  	CPUID_8000_0007_EDX,
> +	CPUID_8000_001B_EAX,
>  	CPUID_8000_0022_EAX,
>  	CPUID_7_2_EDX,
>  	CPUID_24_0_EBX,

The other KVM-only leaves are in the order in which they were added, and
reverse_cpuid[] uses the same order. This patch puts the new leaf in the
middle of the enum, but near the end of reverse_cpuid[].  Please add it at
the end of the enum, after the last existing leaf, and in the same place in
reverse_cpuid[].

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
> index 657f5f743ed9..22cfdb331e9e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,21 @@
>  #define KVM_X86_FEATURE_TSA_SQ_NO	KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0021_ECX, 1)
>  #define KVM_X86_FEATURE_TSA_L1_NO	KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_0021_ECX, 2)
>
> +/* AMD defined Instruction-base Sampling capabilities. CPUID level 0x8000001B (EAX). */

Nit: "Instruction-base" should be "Instruction-Based."

> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_AVAIL			KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 0)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_FETCHSAM		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 1)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_OPSAM			KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 2)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_RDWROPCNT		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 3)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_OPCNT			KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 4)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_BRNTRGT			KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 5)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_OPCNTEXT		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 6)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_RIPINVALIDCHK		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 7)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_OPBRNFUSE		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 8)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_FETCHCTLEXTD		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 9)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_ZEN4_EXT		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 11)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_LOADLATFIL		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 12)
> +#define X86_FEATURE_IBS_ZEN4_DTLBSTAT		KVM_X86_FEATURE(CPUID_8000_001B_EAX, 19)

Bit 10 (IBS_CAPS_OPDATA4 in asm/perf_event.h) is not defined here or later
in the series. Is that an oversight?

Three of these names are different from the IBS_CAPS_* names for the same
bits in asm/perf_event.h: ZEN4_EXT (IBS_CAPS_ZEN4), LOADLATFIL
(IBS_CAPS_OPLDLAT), and ZEN4_DTLBSTAT (IBS_CAPS_OPDTLBPGSIZE). Please
standardize on the existing names.

> +
>  struct cpuid_reg {
>  	u32 function;
>  	u32 index;
> @@ -105,6 +120,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_reg reverse_cpuid[] = {
>  	[CPUID_8000_0022_EAX] = {0x80000022, 0, CPUID_EAX},
>  	[CPUID_7_2_EDX]       = {         7, 2, CPUID_EDX},
>  	[CPUID_24_0_EBX]      = {      0x24, 0, CPUID_EBX},
> +	[CPUID_8000_001B_EAX] = {0x8000001b, 0, CPUID_EAX},
>  	[CPUID_8000_0021_ECX] = {0x80000021, 0, CPUID_ECX},
>  	[CPUID_7_1_ECX]       = {         7, 1, CPUID_ECX},
>  	[CPUID_1E_1_EAX]      = {      0x1e, 1, CPUID_EAX},

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10  6:00 [PATCH v3 0/9] Implement support for IBS virtualization Manali Shukla
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] perf/amd/ibs: Fix race condition in IBS Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 17:19   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] x86/cpufeatures: Add CPUID feature bit for VIBS in SVM/SEV guests Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 17:28   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add a KVM-only leaf for IBS capabilities Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 17:44   ` Jim Mattson [this message]
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: x86: Extend CPUID range to include new leaf Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 17:59   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: SVM: Extend VMCB area for virtualized IBS registers Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 18:01   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: SVM: Add support for IBS Virtualization Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 19:19   ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-08 21:28     ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] perf/x86/amd: Enable VPMU passthrough capability for IBS PMU Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 19:32   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] perf/x86/amd: Remove exclude_guest check from perf_ibs_init() Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 19:38   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  6:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: SVM: Add newly added IBS capabilities and MSRs Manali Shukla
2026-10-08 21:03   ` Jim Mattson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008174424.717033-1-jmattson@google.com \
    --to=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=Naveen.Rao@amd.com \
    --cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox