From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E4C40F750; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791446653; cv=none; b=SkN8V6Jql19R+oQWYWonIuijKoQyNxMO2QaDpCO96nm8wyGJM3WLDBmAGidWfi0xKxtSOGTaptEbF7tWD/YylfF0G3pglAcNV7Xzj/rPRLpphkClJBwCLZrg3XMq02USRCJqNU5p+7F+VlE9DDOnXUuvbeilwAGkbkrBid7NPRU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791446653; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iPRuigRTgI7UNa3JZXmJoZRbz2L9mD3CYobEwbxw4JA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jWNyzcfX5GCDqGek62v4SMo+GOnLq5ZWQLFeinAaXK1rHBvrvQhJb1YXAGKviCg9hZJfhIX5ohD315akjUxg2jZBgP7f5A9NPFPlh8fWzU/h44cFGRvVfPzqxl87fYOw0V/aDxcbMiG1J+tJUywZibWhfM9ib2q4u8IIeO6Qz6E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TboxvBHr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TboxvBHr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791446652; x=1822982652; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPRuigRTgI7UNa3JZXmJoZRbz2L9mD3CYobEwbxw4JA=; b=TboxvBHrmnfXx4RRWMf4RkiGJloUxWwMrq8H26GN0rYK0Tu/YZvPHfb9 5JGzmpIWAAgEdr4Tjbz3HjR0K4v6HvvcTV0sKvQtb5euiipJBJSLwQKyL 9S/6eq3/8+LZlmqE3PXTJ4dm4BRrPgZBryv6XjwPmFveyFZ8WRtSWbZui 8d4AaRa+OHgF/Url0vFdL/6uE8BAa8uemdYSOmKY29A3JTKoAeILeJPzW acY+17F4s0Qg5JsjJ+MB72OIm6b0xr0Kl8rz4lUtJt2RbBSoTvLs6GB6n l1A60WG7ZMWxLcw9VFMP6anHdW41BcZJ31RBaOFiYp2ieOr4t+Zlvinbi w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JMgb1kt+SbePiCpGDOjVTQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yWC+gteQQa28VPz5mNJjCQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11928"; a="110473" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,145,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="110473" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2026 01:04:12 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s14q95EyThmD4zFM9Pa1wQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QJhsjLNATxi+jXB4XZGVKQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,145,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="323577" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.238.2.98]) ([10.238.2.98]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2026 01:04:08 -0700 Message-ID: <2036b58e-d2cb-4992-97d4-cb136bb0a387@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:04:06 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: TDX: Ratelimit the "EPT Violation on pending acceptance page" warning To: Yan Zhao , Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Kiryl Shutsemau , Rick Edgecombe , Dave Hansen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Houghton , Xiaoyao Li , Ackerley Tng , Vishal Annapurve , Sashiko Bot References: <20260930001127.3170009-1-seanjc@google.com> <20260930001127.3170009-4-seanjc@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Binbin Wu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/8/2026 11:08 AM, Yan Zhao wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:11:27PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> Ratelimit TDX's kernel logging when a guest accesses an unaccepted page and >> has opted to disable EPT Violation #VEs for unaccepted accesses, as the >> pr_warn() is trivial for a misbehaving userspace to trigger. > Since the pr_warn() is previously accompanied by a kvm_vm_dead(), which kicks > off all vCPUs and disallows re-entry, a misbehaving guest should not be able to > trigger pr_warn() more than once. > Or are you concerned about the pr_warn() being triggered by multiple misbehaving > guests? But would it be better to print for each guest? Sashiko reported the issue due to the change introduced in the patch 2. Will this change allow a malicious or buggy userspace VMM to flood the host kernel log? By replacing kvm_vm_dead() with KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT and returning 1, KVM will clear the request during vcpu_enter_guest() and exit to userspace with KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN. If the VMM ignores this exit and repeatedly calls KVM_RUN without resetting the vCPU, KVM will immediately re-enter the guest. In this case, is the Fixes tag pointing to e6a85781f783 needed? > >> Fixes: e6a85781f783 ("KVM: TDX: Detect unexpected SEPT violations due to pending SPTEs") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Reported-by: Sashiko Bot >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260923164348.2DB2D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >> index e3723f1222fc..4cac43299851 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >> @@ -1937,8 +1937,8 @@ static int tdx_handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> if (vt_is_tdx_private_gpa(vcpu->kvm, gpa)) { >> if (tdx_is_sept_violation_unexpected_pending(vcpu)) { >> - pr_warn("Guest access before accepting 0x%llx on vCPU %d\n", >> - gpa, vcpu->vcpu_id); >> + pr_warn_ratelimited("Guest access before accepting 0x%llx on vCPU %d\n", >> + gpa, vcpu->vcpu_id); >> kvm_prepare_shutdown_exit(vcpu); >> return 0; >> } >> -- >> 2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog >> >