From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 02/20] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:20:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <234c79fd-1435-71e5-73b7-235724998cdc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71bd9791-cdfe-3930-fdd3-64b27b180c6d@redhat.com>
On 7/4/23 12:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 30/06/2023 11.17, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> The topology information are attributes of the CPU and are
>> specified during the CPU device creation.
>>
>> On hot plug we:
>> - calculate the default values for the topology for drawers,
>> books and sockets in the case they are not specified.
>> - verify the CPU attributes
>> - check that we have still room on the desired socket
>>
>> The possibility to insert a CPU in a mask is dependent on the
>> number of cores allowed in a socket, a book or a drawer, the
>> checking is done during the hot plug of the CPU to have an
>> immediate answer.
>>
>> If the complete topology is not specified, the core is added
>> in the physical topology based on its core ID and it gets
>> defaults values for the modifier attributes.
>>
>> This way, starting QEMU without specifying the topology can
>> still get some advantage of the CPU topology.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
> ...
>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..9164ac00a7
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022,2023
>
> Nit: Add a space after the comma ?
thx
>
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#ifndef HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +#define HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
>> +
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/queue.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "qapi/qapi-types-machine-target.h"
>> +
>> +typedef struct S390Topology {
>> + uint8_t *cores_per_socket;
>> +} S390Topology;
>
> So S390Topology has only one entry, "cores_per_socket" here...
>
> ...
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..b163c17f8f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022,2023
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + * S390 topology handling can be divided in two parts:
>> + *
>> + * - The first part in this file is taking care of all common functions
>> + * used by KVM and TCG to create and modify the topology.
>> + *
>> + * - The second part, building the topology information data for the
>> + * guest with CPU and KVM specificity will be implemented inside
>> + * the target/s390/kvm sub tree.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_topology is used to keep the topology information.
>> + * .cores_per_socket: tracks information on the count of cores
>> + * per socket.
>> + * .smp: keeps track of the machine topology.
>> + *
>
> ... but the description talks about ".smp" here, too, which never
> seems to be added. Leftover from a previous iteration?
> (also: please remove the empty line at the end of the comment)
right, thx
>
>> + */
>> +S390Topology s390_topology = {
>> + /* will be initialized after the cpu model is realized */
>> + .cores_per_socket = NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_socket_nb:
>> + * @cpu: s390x CPU
>> + *
>> + * Returns the socket number used inside the cores_per_socket array
>> + * for a topology tree entry
>> + */
>> +static int __s390_socket_nb(int drawer_id, int book_id, int socket_id)
>
> Please don't use function names starting with double underscores. This
> namespace is reserved by the C standard.
> Maybe "s390_socket_nb_from_ids" ?
OK
>
>> +{
>> + return (drawer_id * current_machine->smp.books + book_id) *
>> + current_machine->smp.sockets + socket_id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_socket_nb:
>> + * @cpu: s390x CPU
>> + *
>> + * Returns the socket number used inside the cores_per_socket array
>> + * for a cpu.
>> + */
>> +static int s390_socket_nb(S390CPU *cpu)
>> +{
>> + return __s390_socket_nb(cpu->env.drawer_id, cpu->env.book_id,
>> + cpu->env.socket_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_has_topology:
>> + *
>> + * Return value: if the topology is supported by the machine.
>
> "Return: true if the topology is supported by the machine"
>
> (QEMU uses kerneldoc style, so it's just "Return:" and not "Return
> value:", see e.g.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html )
OK, thx
>
>> + */
>> +bool s390_has_topology(void)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_init:
>> + * @ms: the machine state where the machine topology is defined
>> + *
>> + * Keep track of the machine topology.
>> + *
>> + * Allocate an array to keep the count of cores per socket.
>> + * The index of the array starts at socket 0 from book 0 and
>> + * drawer 0 up to the maximum allowed by the machine topology.
>> + */
>> +static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms)
>> +{
>> + CpuTopology *smp = &ms->smp;
>> +
>> + s390_topology.cores_per_socket = g_new0(uint8_t, smp->sockets *
>> + smp->books * smp->drawers);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_cpu_default:
>> + * @cpu: pointer to a S390CPU
>> + * @errp: Error pointer
>> + *
>> + * Setup the default topology if no attributes are already set.
>> + * Passing a CPU with some, but not all, attributes set is considered
>> + * an error.
>> + *
>> + * The function calculates the (drawer_id, book_id, socket_id)
>> + * topology by filling the cores starting from the first socket
>> + * (0, 0, 0) up to the last (smp->drawers, smp->books, smp->sockets).
>> + *
>> + * CPU type and dedication have defaults values set in the
>> + * s390x_cpu_properties, entitlement must be adjust depending on the
>> + * dedication.
>> + *
>> + * Returns false if it is impossible to setup a default topology
>> + * true otherwise.
>> + */
>> +static bool s390_topology_cpu_default(S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + CpuTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
>> + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>> +
>> + /* All geometry topology attributes must be set or all unset */
>> + if ((env->socket_id < 0 || env->book_id < 0 || env->drawer_id <
>> 0) &&
>> + (env->socket_id >= 0 || env->book_id >= 0 || env->drawer_id
>> >= 0)) {
>> + error_setg(errp,
>> + "Please define all or none of the topology
>> geometry attributes");
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Check if one of the geometry topology is unset */
>> + if (env->socket_id < 0) {
>> + /* Calculate default geometry topology attributes */
>> + env->socket_id = s390_std_socket(env->core_id, smp);
>> + env->book_id = s390_std_book(env->core_id, smp);
>> + env->drawer_id = s390_std_drawer(env->core_id, smp);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * When the user specifies the entitlement as 'auto' on the
>> command line,
>> + * qemu will set the entitlement as:
>
> s/qemu/QEMU/
ok
>
>> + * Medium when the CPU is not dedicated.
>> + * High when dedicated is true.
>> + */
>> + if (env->entitlement == S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT_AUTO) {
>> + if (env->dedicated) {
>> + env->entitlement = S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT_HIGH;
>> + } else {
>> + env->entitlement = S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT_MEDIUM;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_check:
>> + * @socket_id: socket to check
>> + * @book_id: book to check
>> + * @drawer_id: drawer to check
>> + * @entitlement: entitlement to check
>> + * @dedicated: dedication to check
>> + * @errp: Error pointer
>> + *
>> + * The function checks if the topology
>> + * attributes fits inside the system topology.
>> + *
>> + * Returns false if the specified topology does not match with
>> + * the machine topology.
>> + */
>> +static bool s390_topology_check(uint16_t socket_id, uint16_t book_id,
>> + uint16_t drawer_id, uint16_t
>> entitlement,
>> + bool dedicated, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + CpuTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>> +
>> + if (socket_id >= smp->sockets) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable socket: %d", socket_id);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (book_id >= smp->books) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable book: %d", book_id);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (drawer_id >= smp->drawers) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Unavailable drawer: %d", drawer_id);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (entitlement >= S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT__MAX) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "Unknown entitlement: %d", entitlement);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + if (dedicated && (entitlement == S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT_LOW ||
>> + entitlement == S390_CPU_ENTITLEMENT_MEDIUM)) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "A dedicated cpu implies high entitlement");
>
> s/cpu/CPU/ ?
yes OK
>
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_update_cpu_props:
>> + * @ms: the machine state
>> + * @cpu: the CPU for which to update the properties from the
>> environment.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static void s390_update_cpu_props(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu)
>> +{
>> + CpuInstanceProperties *props;
>> +
>> + props = &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].props;
>> +
>> + props->socket_id = cpu->env.socket_id;
>> + props->book_id = cpu->env.book_id;
>> + props->drawer_id = cpu->env.drawer_id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * s390_topology_setup_cpu:
>> + * @ms: MachineState used to initialize the topology structure on
>> + * first call.
>> + * @cpu: the new S390CPU to insert in the topology structure
>> + * @errp: the error pointer
>> + *
>> + * Called from CPU hotplug to check and setup the CPU attributes
>> + * before the CPU is inserted in the topology.
>> + * There is no need to update the MTCR explicitly here because it
>> + * will be updated by KVM on creation of the new CPU.
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_setup_cpu(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu, Error
>> **errp)
>> +{
>> + ERRP_GUARD();
>> + int entry;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We do not want to initialize the topology if the cpu model
>
> s/cpu/CPU/
ok
>
>> + * does not support topology, consequently, we have to wait for
>> + * the first CPU to be realized, which realizes the CPU model
>> + * to initialize the topology structures.
>> + *
>> + * s390_topology_setup_cpu() is called from the cpu hotplug.
>> + */
>> + if (!s390_topology.cores_per_socket) {
>> + s390_topology_init(ms);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!s390_topology_cpu_default(cpu, errp)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!s390_topology_check(cpu->env.socket_id, cpu->env.book_id,
>> + cpu->env.drawer_id, cpu->env.entitlement,
>> + cpu->env.dedicated, errp)) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Do we still have space in the socket */
>> + entry = s390_socket_nb(cpu);
>> + if (s390_topology.cores_per_socket[entry] >=
>> current_machine->smp.cores) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "No more space on this socket");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Update the count of cores in sockets */
>> + s390_topology.cores_per_socket[entry] += 1;
>> +
>> + /* topology tree is reflected in props */
>> + s390_update_cpu_props(ms, cpu);
>> +}
>
> Thomas
>
>
Thanks, I make the changes.
Regards,
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 9:17 [PATCH v21 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 01/20] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 16:31 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-21 11:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-24 10:15 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-25 8:43 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 02/20] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 10:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 11:20 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-07-24 20:19 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-25 8:44 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 11:40 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-04 12:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-12 20:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-25 15:41 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-26 8:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-27 17:31 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 04/20] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 05/20] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-07-25 13:43 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 06/20] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 07/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 08/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:45 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 7:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-18 12:25 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 09/20] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:55 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 15:44 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 10/20] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:02 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 11/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 13:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:05 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 7:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-18 12:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 12/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 7:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-26 11:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 13/20] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 8:41 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:27 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 14/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 13:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 9:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-12 20:00 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 11:05 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 8:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 11:35 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 16/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 19:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-12 20:11 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-14 16:30 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-19 14:13 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 15:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 17/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-07-19 14:09 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 19/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:28 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 20/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:23 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:02 ` [PATCH v21 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 15:27 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=234c79fd-1435-71e5-73b7-235724998cdc@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox