From: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
To: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: Add tests for SBI FWFT extension
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <242979a7-8264-4768-894a-e566901cbbef@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129-ab75148a5b1ce97ae8529532@orel>
On 29/01/2025 15:17, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 03:15:42PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
>> Add tests for the FWFT SBI extension. Currently, only the reserved range
>> as well as the misaligned exception delegation are used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
>> ---
>> riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
>> lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h | 34 ++++++++
>> riscv/sbi-fwft.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> riscv/sbi.c | 3 +
>> 4 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 riscv/sbi-fwft.c
>>
>> diff --git a/riscv/Makefile b/riscv/Makefile
>> index 5b5e157c..52718f3f 100644
>> --- a/riscv/Makefile
>> +++ b/riscv/Makefile
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/sieve.$(exe)
>>
>> all: $(tests)
>>
>> -$(TEST_DIR)/sbi-deps = $(TEST_DIR)/sbi-asm.o
>> +$(TEST_DIR)/sbi-deps = $(TEST_DIR)/sbi-asm.o $(TEST_DIR)/sbi-fwft.o
>>
>> # When built for EFI sieve needs extra memory, run with e.g. '-m 256' on QEMU
>> $(TEST_DIR)/sieve.$(exe): AUXFLAGS = 0x1
>> diff --git a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
>> index 98a9b097..397400f2 100644
>> --- a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
>> +++ b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,12 @@
>> #define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_AVAILABLE -6
>> #define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STARTED -7
>> #define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED -8
>> +#define SBI_ERR_NO_SHMEM -9
>> +#define SBI_ERR_INVALID_STATE -10
>> +#define SBI_ERR_BAD_RANGE -11
>> +#define SBI_ERR_TIMEOUT -12
>> +#define SBI_ERR_IO -13
>> +#define SBI_ERR_LOCKED -14
>>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> #include <cpumask.h>
>> @@ -23,6 +29,7 @@ enum sbi_ext_id {
>> SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
>> SBI_EXT_DBCN = 0x4442434E,
>> SBI_EXT_SUSP = 0x53555350,
>> + SBI_EXT_FWFT = 0x46574654,
>> };
>>
>> enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
>> @@ -71,6 +78,33 @@ enum sbi_ext_dbcn_fid {
>> SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE_BYTE,
>> };
>>
>> +
>> +enum sbi_ext_fwft_fid {
>> + SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET = 0,
>> + SBI_EXT_FWFT_GET,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG 0x0
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD 0x1
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_SHADOW_STACK 0x2
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_DOUBLE_TRAP 0x3
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING 0x4
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_POINTER_MASKING_PMLEN 0x5
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_RESERVED_START 0x6
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_RESERVED_END 0x3fffffff
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_PLATFORM_START 0x40000000
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_PLATFORM_END 0x7fffffff
>> +
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_RESERVED_START 0x80000000
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_RESERVED_END 0xbfffffff
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_PLATFORM_START 0xc0000000
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_PLATFORM_END 0xffffffff
>> +
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_PLATFORM_FEATURE_BIT BIT(30)
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_FEATURE_BIT BIT(31)
>> +
>> +#define SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK BIT(0)
>> +
>> struct sbiret {
>> long error;
>> long value;
>> diff --git a/riscv/sbi-fwft.c b/riscv/sbi-fwft.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..c9292cfb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/riscv/sbi-fwft.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * SBI verification
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Rivos Inc., Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
>> + */
>> +#include <libcflat.h>
>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/csr.h>
>> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
>> +
>> +#include "sbi-tests.h"
>> +
>> +void check_fwft(void);
>> +
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_set_raw(unsigned long feature, unsigned long value, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_FWFT, SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET, feature, value, flags, 0, 0, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_set(uint32_t feature, unsigned long value, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + return fwft_set_raw(feature, value, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_get_raw(unsigned long feature)
>> +{
>> + return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_FWFT, SBI_EXT_FWFT_GET, feature, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_get(uint32_t feature)
>> +{
>> + return fwft_get_raw(feature);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fwft_check_reserved(unsigned long id)
>> +{
>> + struct sbiret ret;
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_get(id);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED, "get reserved feature 0x%lx", id);
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_set(id, 1, 0);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED, "set reserved feature 0x%lx", id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fwft_check_base(void)
>> +{
>> + struct sbiret ret;
>> +
>> + report_prefix_push("base");
>> +
>> + fwft_check_reserved(SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_RESERVED_START);
>> + fwft_check_reserved(SBI_FWFT_LOCAL_RESERVED_END);
>> + fwft_check_reserved(SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_RESERVED_START);
>> + fwft_check_reserved(SBI_FWFT_GLOBAL_RESERVED_END);
>> +
>> + /* Check id > 32 bits */
>> + if (__riscv_xlen > 32) {
>> + ret = fwft_get_raw(BIT(32));
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "get feature 0x%lx error", BIT(32));
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_set_raw(BIT(32), 0, 0);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "set feature 0x%lx error", BIT(32));
>
> At least with the compiler I'm using, the code inside this
> "if (__riscv_xlen > 32)" block is still getting compiled for
> rv32 and breaking on the BIT(). It doesn't help to use BIT_ULL() here
> since fwft_get/set_raw() take longs. I guess we'll have to use #if.
Acked, forgot to compile for rv32 that time. I'll double check for SSE.
Thanks,
Clément
>
> Fixed on merge.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + report_prefix_pop();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool misaligned_handled;
>> +
>> +static void misaligned_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + misaligned_handled = true;
>> + regs->epc += 4;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_misaligned_exc_set(unsigned long value, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + return fwft_set(SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG, value, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sbiret fwft_misaligned_exc_get(void)
>> +{
>> + return fwft_get(SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fwft_check_misaligned_exc_deleg(void)
>> +{
>> + struct sbiret ret;
>> +
>> + report_prefix_push("misaligned_exc_deleg");
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_get();
>> + if (ret.error == SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> + report_skip("SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG is not supported");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!sbiret_report_error(&ret, 0, "Get misaligned deleg feature no error"))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(2, 0);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "Set misaligned deleg feature invalid value 2");
>> + ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(0xFFFFFFFF, 0);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "Set misaligned deleg feature invalid value 0xFFFFFFFF");
>> +
>> + if (__riscv_xlen > 32) {
>> + ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(BIT(32), 0);
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "Set misaligned deleg with invalid value > 32bits");
>> +
>> + ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(0, BIT(32));
>> + sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM,
>> + "Set misaligned deleg with invalid flag > 32bits");
>
> Same comment as above and also fixed on merge.
>
> Thanks,
> drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 14:15 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for SBI FWFT extension testing Clément Léger
2025-01-28 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: Add "-deps" handling for tests Clément Léger
2025-01-28 14:15 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/2] riscv: Add tests for SBI FWFT extension Clément Léger
2025-01-29 13:47 ` Andrew Jones
2025-01-29 14:17 ` Andrew Jones
2025-02-03 8:47 ` Clément Léger [this message]
2025-01-29 14:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for SBI FWFT extension testing Andrew Jones
2025-03-04 9:34 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=242979a7-8264-4768-894a-e566901cbbef@rivosinc.com \
--to=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox