Re: [PATCH RFC 09/19] iommu/amd: Access/Dirty bit support in IOPTEs

[Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Suravee ,

On 2022/5/31 19:34, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> On 4/29/22 4:09 AM, Joao Martins wrote:
>> .....
>> +static int amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +                    bool enable)
>> +{
>> +    struct protection_domain *pdomain = to_pdomain(domain);
>> +    struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
>> +    bool dom_flush = false;
>> +
>> +    if (!amd_iommu_had_support)
>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry(dev_data, &pdomain->dev_list, list) {
> 
> Since we iterate through device list for the domain, we would need to
> call spin_lock_irqsave(&pdomain->lock, flags) here.

Not related, just out of curiosity. Does it really need to disable the
interrupt while holding this lock? Any case this list would be traversed
in any interrupt context? Perhaps I missed anything?

Best regards,
baolu