From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 5/9] KVM: s390: gs support for kvm guests Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:04:12 +0200 Message-ID: <268251a5-26fa-f1b5-4900-11cc398b43f0@redhat.com> References: <1491562082-6392-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1491562082-6392-6-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <70b26028-8076-c7ff-be17-b99946a20642@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390 , Fan Zhang To: Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53788 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753052AbdDKOEO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:04:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11.04.2017 14:42, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 04/07/2017 02:01 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> Indeed this looks like a bug (and the right fix). >> >> This was not noticed during test since KVM enables the host management of >> registers and we do not use the sdnx. So for the KVM under KVM case this >> does not matter. Still, we should fix it. >> >> Radim, Paolo, do you want a respin of the whole series or can I simply send >> a fixup patch with the next round of patches? > > Radim, Paolo, > > is it ok to schedule the fixup patch for the next round of patches(I plan to > have some more for 4.12 anyway) and apply this series as is? This fix really has low priority (hw not available, KVM not using this feature), so I think this fixup can wait. -- Thanks, David