public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rangemachine@gmail.com, whanos@sergal.fun,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Manually zero/restore DEBUGCTL if LBR virtualization is disabled
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:45:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27bd2e67-5e19-480f-8382-26969045d2f2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224181315.2376869-3-seanjc@google.com>

Hi Sean,

On 24-Feb-25 11:43 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Manually zero DEBUGCTL prior to VMRUN if the host's value is non-zero and
> LBR virtualization is disabled, as hardware only context switches DEBUGCTL
> if LBR virtualization is fully enabled.  Running the guest with the host's
> value has likely been mildly problematic for quite some time, e.g. it will
> result in undesirable behavior if host is running with BTF=1.
> 
> But the bug became fatal with the introduction of Bus Lock Trap ("Detect"
> in kernel paralance) support for AMD (commit 408eb7417a92
> ("x86/bus_lock: Add support for AMD")), as a bus lock in the guest will
> trigger an unexpected #DB.
> 
> Note, suppressing the bus lock #DB, i.e. simply resuming the guest without
> injecting a #DB, is not an option.  It wouldn't address the general issue
> with DEBUGCTL, e.g. for things like BTF, and there are other guest-visible
> side effects if BusLockTrap is left enabled.
> 
> If BusLockTrap is disabled, then DR6.BLD is reserved-to-1; any attempts to
> clear it by software are ignored.  But if BusLockTrap is enabled, software
> can clear DR6.BLD:
> 
>   Software enables bus lock trap by setting DebugCtl MSR[BLCKDB] (bit 2)
>   to 1.  When bus lock trap is enabled, ... The processor indicates that
>   this #DB was caused by a bus lock by clearing DR6[BLD] (bit 11).  DR6[11]
>   previously had been defined to be always 1.
> 
> and clearing DR6.BLD is "sticky" in that it's not set (i.e. lowered) by
> other #DBs:
> 
>   All other #DB exceptions leave DR6[BLD] unmodified
> 
> E.g. leaving BusLockTrap enable can confuse a legacy guest that writes '0'
> to reset DR6.

What if guest sets DEBUGCTL[BusLockTrapEn] and runs an application which
causes a bus lock? Guest will receive #DB due to bus lock, even though
guest CPUID says BusLockTrap isn't supported. Should KVM prevent guest
to write to DEBUGCTL[BusLockTrapEn]? Something like:

---
@@ -3168,6 +3168,10 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 		if (data & DEBUGCTL_RESERVED_BITS)
 			return 1;
 
+		if ((data & DEBUGCTLMSR_BUS_LOCK_DETECT) &&
+		    !guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT))
+			return 1;
+
 		svm_get_lbr_vmcb(svm)->save.dbgctl = data;
 		svm_update_lbrv(vcpu);
 		break;
---

Thanks,
Ravi

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 18:13 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: SVM: Zero DEBUGCTL before VMRUN if necessary Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Snapshot the host's DEBUGCTL in common x86 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 16:19   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-02-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Manually zero/restore DEBUGCTL if LBR virtualization is disabled Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26  6:15   ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2025-02-26 15:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Snapshot the host's DEBUGCTL after disabling IRQs Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: SVM: Zero DEBUGCTL before VMRUN if necessary Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27bd2e67-5e19-480f-8382-26969045d2f2@amd.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rangemachine@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=whanos@sergal.fun \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox