public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, likexu@tencent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when host-initiated
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:12:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b3be388-400e-7871-7d73-aba50d49a9b7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b59b1c0-112b-5e07-e613-607220c3b597@redhat.com>


On 6/1/2022 4:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 5/31/22 20:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> +
>>>           /*
>>>            * Writing depth MSR from guest could either setting the
>>>            * MSR or resetting the LBR records with the side-effect.
>>> @@ -535,6 +542,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu 
>>> *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>>       case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>>           if (!arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(vcpu, data))
>>>               break;
>>> +        if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> +            return 0;
>>
>> Similar bug here.
>>
>> Can we just punt this out of kvm/queue until its been properly reviewed?
>
> Yes, I agree.  I have started making some changes and pushed the 
> result to kvm/arch-lbr-for-weijiang.
>
> Most of the MSR handling is rewritten (and untested).
>
> The nested VMX handling was also completely broken so I just removed 
> it.  Instead, KVM should be adjusted so that it does not whine.

Noted, I'll run tests based on it, thanks a lot!

Has the branch been pushed? I cannot see it.

>
> Paolo
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 17:54 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: respect KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST/KVM_SET_MSR contracts Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-31 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx, pmu: accept 0 for absent MSRs when host-initiated Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-31 18:37   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-01  2:46     ` Like Xu
2022-06-01  8:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-01 16:39       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-02  2:12         ` Like Xu
2022-06-15 18:52           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-16 10:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-16 15:30               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-01  8:54     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-01  9:12       ` Yang, Weijiang [this message]
2022-06-01 10:15         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-01 10:42           ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-31 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: always allow host-initiated writes to PMU MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-01  1:12   ` Like Xu
2022-06-08 22:22   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b3be388-400e-7871-7d73-aba50d49a9b7@intel.com \
    --to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox