public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, mst@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:21:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c048ae6-329e-1351-2711-e72e31c8554e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ba7f198-4403-c9d1-f0be-7069cc8cd421@suse.de>

On 2017/8/29 19:58, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 01:46 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> Some latency-intensive workload will see obviously performance
>> drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
>> is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost i have seen is
>> inside idle path.
>>
>> This patch introduces a new mechanism to poll for a while before
>> entering idle state. If schedule is needed during poll, then we
>> don't need to goes through the heavy overhead path.
>>
>> Here is the data we get when running benchmark contextswitch to measure
>> the latency(lower is better):
>>
>>     1. w/o patch:
>>        2493.14 ns/ctxsw -- 200.3 %CPU
>>     2. w/ patch:
>>        halt_poll_threshold=10000 -- 1485.96ns/ctxsw -- 201.0 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_threshold=20000 -- 1391.26 ns/ctxsw -- 200.7 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_threshold=30000 -- 1488.55 ns/ctxsw -- 200.1 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_threshold=500000 -- 1159.14 ns/ctxsw -- 201.5 %CPU
>>     3. kvm dynamic poll
>>        halt_poll_ns=10000 -- 2296.11 ns/ctxsw -- 201.2 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_ns=20000 -- 2599.7 ns/ctxsw -- 201.7 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_ns=30000 -- 2588.68 ns/ctxsw -- 211.6 %CPU
>>        halt_poll_ns=500000 -- 2423.20 ns/ctxsw -- 229.2 %CPU
>>     4. idle=poll
>>        2050.1 ns/ctxsw -- 1003 %CPU
>>     5. idle=mwait
>>        2188.06 ns/ctxsw -- 206.3 %CPU
> 
> Could you please try to create another metric for guest initiated, host 
> aborted mwait?
> 
> For a quick benchmark, reserve 4 registers for a magic value, set them 
> to the magic value before you enter MWAIT in the guest. Then allow 
> native MWAIT execution on the host. If you see the guest wants to enter 

I guess you want to allow native MWAIT execution on the guest not host?

> with the 4 registers containing the magic contents and no events are 
> pending, directly go into the vcpu block function on the host.

Mmm..It is not very clear to me. If guest executes MWAIT without vmexit, 
how to check the register?

> 
> That way any time a guest gets naturally aborted while in mwait, it will 
> only reenter mwait when an event actually occured. While the guest is 
> normally running (and nobody else wants to run on the host), we just 
> stay in guest context, but with a sleeping CPU.
> 
> Overall, that might give us even better performance, as it allows for 
> turbo boost and HT to work properly.

In our testing,  we have enough cores(32cores) but only 10VCPUs, so in 
the best case, we may see the same performance as poll.

-- 
Yang
Alibaba Cloud Computing

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-01  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 11:46 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] x86/paravirt: Add pv_idle_ops to paravirt ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 13:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-30  7:33     ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-01  6:50     ` Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] KVM guest: register kvm_idle_poll for pv_idle_ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/idle: Add poll before enter real idle path Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 12:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01  5:57     ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14  8:41       ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14  9:18         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-29 14:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01  6:49     ` Quan Xu
2017-09-29 10:39       ` Quan Xu
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] x86/paravirt: Add update in x86/paravirt pv_idle_ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] Documentation: Add three sysctls for smart idle poll Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 17:20   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] KVM guest: introduce smart idle poll algorithm Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] sched/idle: update poll time when wakeup from idle Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 12:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01  7:30     ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-29 10:29     ` Quan Xu
2017-08-29 11:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support Alexander Graf
2017-09-01  6:21   ` Yang Zhang [this message]
2017-08-29 13:03 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-29 14:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-08-29 14:27   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-29 14:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-01  6:32   ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-01  6:52     ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-01  6:44   ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-01  6:58     ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-01  7:53       ` Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 14:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-13 11:56   ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-14  8:36     ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14  9:19       ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-14  9:40         ` Quan Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c048ae6-329e-1351-2711-e72e31c8554e@gmail.com \
    --to=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox