From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
dmatlack@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:21:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c048ae6-329e-1351-2711-e72e31c8554e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ba7f198-4403-c9d1-f0be-7069cc8cd421@suse.de>
On 2017/8/29 19:58, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08/29/2017 01:46 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> Some latency-intensive workload will see obviously performance
>> drop when running inside VM. The main reason is that the overhead
>> is amplified when running inside VM. The most cost i have seen is
>> inside idle path.
>>
>> This patch introduces a new mechanism to poll for a while before
>> entering idle state. If schedule is needed during poll, then we
>> don't need to goes through the heavy overhead path.
>>
>> Here is the data we get when running benchmark contextswitch to measure
>> the latency(lower is better):
>>
>> 1. w/o patch:
>> 2493.14 ns/ctxsw -- 200.3 %CPU
>> 2. w/ patch:
>> halt_poll_threshold=10000 -- 1485.96ns/ctxsw -- 201.0 %CPU
>> halt_poll_threshold=20000 -- 1391.26 ns/ctxsw -- 200.7 %CPU
>> halt_poll_threshold=30000 -- 1488.55 ns/ctxsw -- 200.1 %CPU
>> halt_poll_threshold=500000 -- 1159.14 ns/ctxsw -- 201.5 %CPU
>> 3. kvm dynamic poll
>> halt_poll_ns=10000 -- 2296.11 ns/ctxsw -- 201.2 %CPU
>> halt_poll_ns=20000 -- 2599.7 ns/ctxsw -- 201.7 %CPU
>> halt_poll_ns=30000 -- 2588.68 ns/ctxsw -- 211.6 %CPU
>> halt_poll_ns=500000 -- 2423.20 ns/ctxsw -- 229.2 %CPU
>> 4. idle=poll
>> 2050.1 ns/ctxsw -- 1003 %CPU
>> 5. idle=mwait
>> 2188.06 ns/ctxsw -- 206.3 %CPU
>
> Could you please try to create another metric for guest initiated, host
> aborted mwait?
>
> For a quick benchmark, reserve 4 registers for a magic value, set them
> to the magic value before you enter MWAIT in the guest. Then allow
> native MWAIT execution on the host. If you see the guest wants to enter
I guess you want to allow native MWAIT execution on the guest not host?
> with the 4 registers containing the magic contents and no events are
> pending, directly go into the vcpu block function on the host.
Mmm..It is not very clear to me. If guest executes MWAIT without vmexit,
how to check the register?
>
> That way any time a guest gets naturally aborted while in mwait, it will
> only reenter mwait when an event actually occured. While the guest is
> normally running (and nobody else wants to run on the host), we just
> stay in guest context, but with a sleeping CPU.
>
> Overall, that might give us even better performance, as it allows for
> turbo boost and HT to work properly.
In our testing, we have enough cores(32cores) but only 10VCPUs, so in
the best case, we may see the same performance as poll.
--
Yang
Alibaba Cloud Computing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-29 11:46 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] x86/paravirt: Add pv_idle_ops to paravirt ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 13:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-30 7:33 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-01 6:50 ` Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] KVM guest: register kvm_idle_poll for pv_idle_ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/idle: Add poll before enter real idle path Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 5:57 ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14 8:41 ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14 9:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-29 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-01 6:49 ` Quan Xu
2017-09-29 10:39 ` Quan Xu
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] x86/paravirt: Add update in x86/paravirt pv_idle_ops Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] Documentation: Add three sysctls for smart idle poll Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] KVM guest: introduce smart idle poll algorithm Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] sched/idle: update poll time when wakeup from idle Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 7:30 ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-29 10:29 ` Quan Xu
2017-08-29 11:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] x86/idle: add halt poll support Alexander Graf
2017-09-01 6:21 ` Yang Zhang [this message]
2017-08-29 13:03 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-29 14:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-08-29 14:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-08-29 14:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-01 6:32 ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-01 6:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-01 6:44 ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-01 6:58 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-01 7:53 ` Yang Zhang
2017-08-29 14:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-13 11:56 ` Yang Zhang
2017-09-14 8:36 ` Quan Xu
2017-09-14 9:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-09-14 9:40 ` Quan Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c048ae6-329e-1351-2711-e72e31c8554e@gmail.com \
--to=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox