From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86: Support environments without test-devices
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 18:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e359eb2-4b2a-0a52-6c43-cd6037bb72ae@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628203019.3220-4-nadav.amit@gmail.com>
On 28/06/19 22:30, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Enable to run the tests when test-device is not present (e.g.,
> bare-metal). Users can provide the number of CPUs and ram size through
> kernel parameters.
>
> On Ubuntu, for example, the tests can be run by copying a test to the
> boot directory (/boot) and adding a menuentry to grub (editing
> /etc/grub.d/40_custom):
>
> menuentry 'idt_test' {
> set root='ROOT'
> multiboot BOOT_RELATIVE/idt_test.flat ignore nb_cpus=48 \
> ram_size=4294967296 no-test-device
> }
>
> Replace ROOT with `grub-probe --target=bios_hints /boot` and
> BOOT_RELATIVE with `grub-mkrelpath /boot`, and run update-grub.
>
> Note that the first kernel parameter is ignored for compatibility with
> test executions through QEMU.
>
> Remember that the output goes to the serial port.
RAM size can use the multiboot info (see lib/x86/setup.c).
For the # of CPUs I'm not sure what you're supposed to do on bare metal
though. :)
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/x86/fwcfg.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/x86/fwcfg.h | 4 ++++
> x86/apic.c | 4 +++-
> x86/cstart64.S | 13 ++++++++---
> x86/eventinj.c | 20 ++++++++++++----
> x86/vmx_tests.c | 7 ++++++
> 6 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/fwcfg.c b/lib/x86/fwcfg.c
> index c52b445..8d320e2 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/fwcfg.c
> +++ b/lib/x86/fwcfg.c
> @@ -1,14 +1,76 @@
> #include "fwcfg.h"
> #include "smp.h"
> +#include "libcflat.h"
>
> static struct spinlock lock;
>
> +struct fw_override_val {
> + bool initialized;
> + uint64_t val;
> +};
> +
> +static struct fw_override_val fw_override[FW_CFG_MAX_ENTRY];
> +
> +static const char *cfg_names[FW_CFG_MAX_ENTRY] = {
> + [FW_CFG_NB_CPUS] = "nb_cpus",
> + [FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE] = "ram_size",
> +};
> +
> +bool no_test_device;
> +
> +void read_cfg_override(int argc, const char *argv[])
> +{
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /* Check if there is no test device */
> + for (j = 0; j < argc; j++) {
> + const char *arg = argv[j];
> +
> + if (!strcmp("no-test-device", arg)) {
> + no_test_device = true;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < FW_CFG_MAX_ENTRY; i++) {
> + const char *cfg_name = cfg_names[i];
> + size_t name_len;
> +
> + name_len = strlen(cfg_name);
> +
> + if (cfg_name == NULL)
> + continue;
> +
> + name_len = strlen(cfg_name);
> +
> + if (strncmp(cfg_name, arg, name_len))
> + continue;
> + if (arg[name_len] != '=')
> + continue;
> + if (strlen(arg) <= name_len + 1)
> + continue;
> +
> + fw_override[i].val = atol(arg + name_len + 1);
> + fw_override[i].initialized = true;
> +
> + printf("cfg-override: %s = 0x%lx\n", cfg_name, fw_override[i].val);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +bool test_device_enabled(void)
> +{
> + return !no_test_device;
> +}
> +
> static uint64_t fwcfg_get_u(uint16_t index, int bytes)
> {
> uint64_t r = 0;
> uint8_t b;
> int i;
>
> + if (fw_override[index].initialized)
> + return fw_override[index].val;
> +
> spin_lock(&lock);
> asm volatile ("out %0, %1" : : "a"(index), "d"((uint16_t)BIOS_CFG_IOPORT));
> for (i = 0; i < bytes; ++i) {
> diff --git a/lib/x86/fwcfg.h b/lib/x86/fwcfg.h
> index e0836ca..14801d7 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/fwcfg.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/fwcfg.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define FWCFG_H
>
> #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> #define FW_CFG_SIGNATURE 0x00
> #define FW_CFG_ID 0x01
> @@ -33,6 +34,9 @@
> #define FW_CFG_SMBIOS_ENTRIES (FW_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL + 1)
> #define FW_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE (FW_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL + 2)
>
> +void read_cfg_override(int argc, const char *argv[]);
> +bool test_device_enabled(void);
> +
> uint8_t fwcfg_get_u8(unsigned index);
> uint16_t fwcfg_get_u16(unsigned index);
> uint32_t fwcfg_get_u32(unsigned index);
> diff --git a/x86/apic.c b/x86/apic.c
> index 7617351..f01a5e7 100644
> --- a/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/x86/apic.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include "isr.h"
> #include "msr.h"
> #include "atomic.h"
> +#include "fwcfg.h"
>
> #define MAX_TPR 0xf
>
> @@ -655,7 +656,8 @@ int main(void)
>
> test_self_ipi();
> test_physical_broadcast();
> - test_pv_ipi();
> + if (test_device_enabled())
> + test_pv_ipi();
>
> test_sti_nmi();
> test_multiple_nmi();
> diff --git a/x86/cstart64.S b/x86/cstart64.S
> index 9d89887..cc7926a 100644
> --- a/x86/cstart64.S
> +++ b/x86/cstart64.S
> @@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ start64:
> call load_tss
> call mask_pic_interrupts
> call enable_apic
> - call save_id
> - call smp_init
> - call enable_x2apic
> mov mb_boot_info(%rip), %rbx
> mov %rbx, %rdi
> call setup_multiboot
> @@ -254,6 +251,16 @@ start64:
> mov mb_cmdline(%rbx), %eax
> mov %rax, __args(%rip)
> call __setup_args
> +
> + /* read configuration override */
> + mov __argc(%rip), %edi
> + lea __argv(%rip), %rsi
> + call read_cfg_override
> +
> + call save_id
> + call smp_init
> + call enable_x2apic
> +
> mov __argc(%rip), %edi
> lea __argv(%rip), %rsi
> lea __environ(%rip), %rdx
> diff --git a/x86/eventinj.c b/x86/eventinj.c
> index 901b9db..9e4dbec 100644
> --- a/x86/eventinj.c
> +++ b/x86/eventinj.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include "vmalloc.h"
> #include "alloc_page.h"
> #include "delay.h"
> +#include "fwcfg.h"
>
> #ifdef __x86_64__
> # define R "r"
> @@ -28,10 +29,15 @@ static void apic_self_nmi(void)
> apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_INT_ASSERT, 0);
> }
>
> -#define flush_phys_addr(__s) outl(__s, 0xe4)
> +#define flush_phys_addr(__s) do { \
> + if (test_device_enabled()) \
> + outl(__s, 0xe4); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> #define flush_stack() do { \
> int __l; \
> - flush_phys_addr(virt_to_phys(&__l)); \
> + if (test_device_enabled()) \
> + flush_phys_addr(virt_to_phys(&__l)); \
> } while (0)
>
> extern char isr_iret_ip[];
> @@ -136,6 +142,8 @@ extern void do_iret(ulong phys_stack, void *virt_stack);
> // Return to same privilege level won't pop SS or SP, so
> // save it in RDX while we run on the nested stack
>
> +extern bool no_test_device;
> +
> asm("do_iret:"
> #ifdef __x86_64__
> "mov %rdi, %rax \n\t" // phys_stack
> @@ -148,10 +156,14 @@ asm("do_iret:"
> "pushf"W" \n\t"
> "mov %cs, %ecx \n\t"
> "push"W" %"R "cx \n\t"
> - "push"W" $1f \n\t"
> + "push"W" $2f \n\t"
> +
> + "cmpb $0, no_test_device\n\t" // see if need to flush
> + "jnz 1f\n\t"
> "outl %eax, $0xe4 \n\t" // flush page
> + "1: \n\t"
> "iret"W" \n\t"
> - "1: xchg %"R "dx, %"R "sp \n\t" // point to old stack
> + "2: xchg %"R "dx, %"R "sp \n\t" // point to old stack
> "ret\n\t"
> );
>
> diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c
> index c51de1c..5709fa8 100644
> --- a/x86/vmx_tests.c
> +++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c
> @@ -8017,6 +8017,13 @@ static void vmx_apic_passthrough(bool set_irq_line_from_thread)
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Test device required for generating IRQs
> + */
> + if (!test_device_enabled()) {
> + report_skip(__func__);
> + return;
> + }
> u64 cpu_ctrl_0 = CPU_SECONDARY;
> u64 cpu_ctrl_1 = 0;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-02 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 20:30 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86: Running tests on bare-metal Nadav Amit
2019-06-28 20:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] libcflat: use stdbool Nadav Amit
2019-07-02 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-28 20:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/vmx: Use plus for positive filters Nadav Amit
2019-06-28 20:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86: Support environments without test-devices Nadav Amit
2019-07-02 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-07-02 16:43 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-02 17:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-02 17:45 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-02 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-02 23:39 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-02 23:56 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-03 5:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-03 6:09 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-15 15:48 ` Andrew Jones
2019-07-15 18:08 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-15 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-15 18:43 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-15 18:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-21 16:40 ` Nadav Amit
2019-07-21 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e359eb2-4b2a-0a52-6c43-cd6037bb72ae@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox