public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Add CR save area
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:33:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32fd3fc1-be79-d552-c8da-e341ca058651@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105162828.2490-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On 05.11.19 17:28, Janosch Frank wrote:
> If we run with DAT enabled and do a reset, we need to save the CRs to
> backup our ASCEs on a diag308 for example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c  | 2 +-
>   lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 4 ++--
>   lib/s390x/interrupt.c    | 4 ++--
>   lib/s390x/smp.c          | 2 +-
>   s390x/cstart64.S         | 9 ++++++---
>   5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> index 6e2d259..4b213f8 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int main(void)
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS, lowcore, sw_int_grs);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS, lowcore, sw_int_fprs);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC, lowcore, sw_int_fpc);
> -	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0, lowcore, sw_int_cr0);
> +	OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS, lowcore, sw_int_crs);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_EXT_SA_ADDR, lowcore, mcck_ext_sa_addr);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_FPRS_SA, lowcore, fprs_sa);
>   	OFFSET(GEN_LC_GRS_SA, lowcore, grs_sa);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 96cca2e..07d4e5e 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ struct lowcore {
>   	uint64_t	sw_int_fprs[16];		/* 0x0280 */
>   	uint32_t	sw_int_fpc;			/* 0x0300 */
>   	uint8_t		pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0304];	/* 0x0304 */
> -	uint64_t	sw_int_cr0;			/* 0x0308 */
> -	uint8_t		pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0310];	/* 0x0310 */
> +	uint64_t	sw_int_crs[16];			/* 0x0308 */
> +	uint8_t		pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0388];	/* 0x0388 */
>   	uint64_t	mcck_ext_sa_addr;		/* 0x11b0 */
>   	uint8_t		pad_0x11b8[0x1200 - 0x11b8];	/* 0x11b8 */
>   	uint64_t	fprs_sa[16];			/* 0x1200 */
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 5cade23..c9e2dc6 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -124,13 +124,13 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (lc->ext_int_code == EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
> -		lc->sw_int_cr0 &= ~(1UL << 9);
> +		lc->sw_int_crs[0] &= ~(1UL << 9);
>   		sclp_handle_ext();
>   	} else {
>   		ext_int_expected = false;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!(lc->sw_int_cr0 & CR0_EXTM_MASK))
> +	if (!(lc->sw_int_crs[0] & CR0_EXTM_MASK))
>   		lc->ext_old_psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_EXT;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> index 7602886..f57f420 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
>   	cpu->lowcore->sw_int_grs[15] = (uint64_t)cpu->stack + (PAGE_SIZE * 4);
>   	lc->restart_new_psw.mask = 0x0000000180000000UL;
>   	lc->restart_new_psw.addr = (uint64_t)smp_cpu_setup_state;
> -	lc->sw_int_cr0 = 0x0000000000040000UL;
> +	lc->sw_int_crs[0] = 0x0000000000040000UL;
>   
>   	/* Start processing */
>   	rc = sigp_retry(cpu->addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 8e2b21e..0455591 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ memsetxc:
>   	/* save grs 0-15 */
>   	stmg	%r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
>   	/* save cr0 */

Comment needs an update

> -	stctg	%c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> +	stctg	%c0, %c15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
>   	/* load initial cr0 again */
>   	larl	%r1, initial_cr0
>   	lctlg	%c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> @@ -107,13 +107,16 @@ memsetxc:
>   
>   	.macro RESTORE_REGS
>   	/* restore fprs 0-15 + fpc */
> +	/* load initial cr0 again */

Two comments in a wrong look wrong.

> +	larl	%r1, initial_cr0
> +	lctlg	%c0, %c0, 0(%r1)

This hunk does somewhat not fit to this patch description. This needs an 
explanation or should be moved to a separate patch.

>   	la	%r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
>   	.irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>   	ld	\i, \i * 8(%r1)
>   	.endr
>   	lfpc	GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
>   	/* restore cr0 */

Comments needs an update

> -	lctlg	%c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> +	lctlg	%c0, %c15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
>   	/* restore grs 0-15 */
>   	lmg	%r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
>   	.endm
> @@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ diag308_load_reset:
>   smp_cpu_setup_state:
>   	xgr	%r1, %r1
>   	lmg     %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> -	lctlg   %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> +	lctlg   %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
>   	br	%r14
>   
>   pgm_int:
> 

Apart from that looks good.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05 16:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 16:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Add CR save area Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 19:33   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-11-05 16:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: Remove DAT and add short indication psw bits on diag308 reset Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 19:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-06  6:58     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-06 10:19   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 David Hildenbrand
2019-11-05 18:23   ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-05 18:37     ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32fd3fc1-be79-d552-c8da-e341ca058651@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox