From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Add CR save area
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:33:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32fd3fc1-be79-d552-c8da-e341ca058651@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105162828.2490-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 05.11.19 17:28, Janosch Frank wrote:
> If we run with DAT enabled and do a reset, we need to save the CRs to
> backup our ASCEs on a diag308 for example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c | 2 +-
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 4 ++--
> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
> lib/s390x/smp.c | 2 +-
> s390x/cstart64.S | 9 ++++++---
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> index 6e2d259..4b213f8 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int main(void)
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS, lowcore, sw_int_grs);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS, lowcore, sw_int_fprs);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC, lowcore, sw_int_fpc);
> - OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0, lowcore, sw_int_cr0);
> + OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS, lowcore, sw_int_crs);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_EXT_SA_ADDR, lowcore, mcck_ext_sa_addr);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_FPRS_SA, lowcore, fprs_sa);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_GRS_SA, lowcore, grs_sa);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 96cca2e..07d4e5e 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ struct lowcore {
> uint64_t sw_int_fprs[16]; /* 0x0280 */
> uint32_t sw_int_fpc; /* 0x0300 */
> uint8_t pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0304]; /* 0x0304 */
> - uint64_t sw_int_cr0; /* 0x0308 */
> - uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0310]; /* 0x0310 */
> + uint64_t sw_int_crs[16]; /* 0x0308 */
> + uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0388]; /* 0x0388 */
> uint64_t mcck_ext_sa_addr; /* 0x11b0 */
> uint8_t pad_0x11b8[0x1200 - 0x11b8]; /* 0x11b8 */
> uint64_t fprs_sa[16]; /* 0x1200 */
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 5cade23..c9e2dc6 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -124,13 +124,13 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
> }
>
> if (lc->ext_int_code == EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
> - lc->sw_int_cr0 &= ~(1UL << 9);
> + lc->sw_int_crs[0] &= ~(1UL << 9);
> sclp_handle_ext();
> } else {
> ext_int_expected = false;
> }
>
> - if (!(lc->sw_int_cr0 & CR0_EXTM_MASK))
> + if (!(lc->sw_int_crs[0] & CR0_EXTM_MASK))
> lc->ext_old_psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_EXT;
> }
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.c b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> index 7602886..f57f420 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int smp_cpu_setup(uint16_t addr, struct psw psw)
> cpu->lowcore->sw_int_grs[15] = (uint64_t)cpu->stack + (PAGE_SIZE * 4);
> lc->restart_new_psw.mask = 0x0000000180000000UL;
> lc->restart_new_psw.addr = (uint64_t)smp_cpu_setup_state;
> - lc->sw_int_cr0 = 0x0000000000040000UL;
> + lc->sw_int_crs[0] = 0x0000000000040000UL;
>
> /* Start processing */
> rc = sigp_retry(cpu->addr, SIGP_RESTART, 0, NULL);
> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 8e2b21e..0455591 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ memsetxc:
> /* save grs 0-15 */
> stmg %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> /* save cr0 */
Comment needs an update
> - stctg %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> + stctg %c0, %c15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
> /* load initial cr0 again */
> larl %r1, initial_cr0
> lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> @@ -107,13 +107,16 @@ memsetxc:
>
> .macro RESTORE_REGS
> /* restore fprs 0-15 + fpc */
> + /* load initial cr0 again */
Two comments in a wrong look wrong.
> + larl %r1, initial_cr0
> + lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
This hunk does somewhat not fit to this patch description. This needs an
explanation or should be moved to a separate patch.
> la %r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
> .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> ld \i, \i * 8(%r1)
> .endr
> lfpc GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
> /* restore cr0 */
Comments needs an update
> - lctlg %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> + lctlg %c0, %c15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
> /* restore grs 0-15 */
> lmg %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> .endm
> @@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ diag308_load_reset:
> smp_cpu_setup_state:
> xgr %r1, %r1
> lmg %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> - lctlg %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CR0
> + lctlg %c0, %c0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
> br %r14
>
> pgm_int:
>
Apart from that looks good.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 16:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 16:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/2] s390x: Add CR save area Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 19:33 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-11-05 16:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] s390x: Remove DAT and add short indication psw bits on diag308 reset Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 19:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-06 6:58 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-06 10:19 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-05 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/2] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 David Hildenbrand
2019-11-05 18:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-05 18:37 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32fd3fc1-be79-d552-c8da-e341ca058651@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox