From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86/run: Use separate "-accel" option to configure the accelerator
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:09:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36b42923-21ee-4cac-b050-781770824037@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ah87cbm6mxt0aWWk@google.com>
On 6/3/2026 4:22 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>> On 5/29/2026 8:09 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>>> On 5/28/2026 9:00 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2026, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>>>>>> When configuring accelerator via machine's "accel" property, it cannot
>>>>>> pass additional ACCEL_PROPS. For example, it hits following error when
>>>>>> configuring KVM with "notify-vmexit":
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # ACCEL="kvm,notify-vmexit=internal-error" ./x86-run x86/apic.c
>>>>>> # qemu-system-x86_64: Property
>>>>>> 'pc-i440fx-11.1-machine.notify- vmexit' not found
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Switch to use separate "-accel" option to configure the accelerator.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> x86/run | 2 +-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/x86/run b/x86/run
>>>>>> index dd38f14c871f..a68d469dd1b8 100755
>>>>>> --- a/x86/run
>>>>>> +++ b/x86/run
>>>>>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ fi
>>>>>> pit="-global kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=discard"
>>>>>> command="${qemu} --no-reboot -nodefaults $pit $pc_testdev
>>>>>> -display none -serial stdio $pci_testdev"
>>>>>> -command+=" -machine accel=$ACCEL$ACCEL_PROPS"
>>>>>> +command+=" -accel $ACCEL$ACCEL_PROPS"
>>>>>
>>>>> This breaks my setup for specifying kernel_irqchip=split.
>>>>>
>>>>> qemu: -accel kvm,kernel_irqchip=split: Property 'kvm-
>>>>> accel.kernel_irqchip' not found
>>>>
>>>> If you switch "kernel_irqchip" to "kernel-irqchip", it should work again.
>>>>
>>>> This needs to be fixed on QEMU side. I'll look at it.
>>>
>>> Well, I feel hard to justify a QEMU "fix" for it.
>>>
>>> "kernel_irqchip" was a property of "machine" in old QEMU, and QEMU switched
>>> it to "kernel-irqchip" automatically.
>>>
>>> Then QEMU moved it to be a property of "accel", while keeping the
>>> compatibility when users configure it via "machine" that QEMU internally
>>> setting it to accel's property in this case.
>>>
>>> However, "kernel_irqchip" is only valid on "machine", but not on "accel".
>>>
>>> For this KVM unit test issue, do we need to add workaround to keep your
>>> (work-by-accident) usage working? or just kill it?
>>
>> Nah, just switch to "accel" and call it good. I'm likely the one and only user
>> of kernel_irqchip.
>
> There's another problem: the CET and LAM tests force -enable-kvm:
>
> [cet]
> file = cet.flat
> arch = x86_64
> smp = 2
> qemu_params = -enable-kvm -m 2048 -cpu host
>
> [lam]
> file = lam.flat
> arch = x86_64
> qemu_params = -enable-kvm -cpu max
>
> Which apparently is wired up to "-machine accel=" under the hood, because they
> get skipped with:
>
> SKIP cet (qemu: The -accel and "-machine accel=" options are incompatible)
> SKIP lam (qemu: The -accel and "-machine accel=" options are incompatible)
Oh, sorry for not respond. I didn't see this mail until I decided to ping you
for this patch after I noticed you were queuing kvm-unit-test patches.
I just sent a v2, which adds one patch to handle cet and lam tests:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260929202434.174501-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 7:17 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86/run: Use separate "-accel" option to configure the accelerator Xiaoyao Li
2026-05-28 13:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-29 0:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-05-29 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-02 10:00 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-06-02 14:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-02 20:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-29 13:09 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36b42923-21ee-4cac-b050-781770824037@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox